Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bob Morrison (RHmorrison![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:58:43 -0700 (PDT) |
On 5/7, Chili Head wrote: However, I am discouraged by much that I have read about cohousing, and whether or not we could ever find a place for ourselves in such a community. For one, from the above article, "There are only three senior cohousing developments [up and running] in the USA." Like her, I'm discouraged at how slowly the senior cohousing movement is moving. I think part of the problem is that senior cohousing is drawing from a smaller demographic than "regular" cohousing is. Regular cohousing draws people from ages 0-18 and 20-85 (there are few people in their 20s who live in cohousing). Senior cohousing draws people from age 55 up. It makes sense that if you draw from a smaller demographic, it's harder to reach critical mass with a group. But I sense there is more to the problem than this. Also, the recession has put a major damper on cohousing of all kinds. If you are trying to do a specialized form of cohousing, such as senior cohousing, this "double whammy" makes it almost impossible. Bob Morrison
- Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing, (continued)
-
Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Chili Head, May 5 2009
- Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Craig Ragland, May 6 2009
- Re: USA Today ARticle on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Jessica Groom, May 7 2009
- Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing R.N. Johnson, May 7 2009
- Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Bob Morrison, May 8 2009
- Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Sharon Villines, May 8 2009
-
Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Chili Head, May 5 2009
- Re: USA Today Article on Silver Sage and Senior Cohousing Suzanne Marriott, May 8 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.