Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (Kay.Argyle![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:01:46 -0800 (PST) |
" 'The only sticking point was that they had to own the land underneath the house - shares don't work for them.' "This is the kind of requirement/restriction that is present in all the subsidy programs that I know of." Wasatch Commons' community's land is owned as "undivided" shares; our five income-qualified units are a fourplex and half of a duplex (of which the other half is a market-rate unit). The units were financed through Utah Housing Corp.'s CROWN program, which is a rent-to-own program based on federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits. The majority of homes in the program are detached single-family houses, where the land would indeed be individually owned. I don't know if ours are the only exception. Getting an exception was probably made easier by several factors: the CROWN program is UHC's own baby, so it could decide to make an exception; we had a foot in the door in the form of a member's brother who worked for UHC and could steer us through the application process; and the program was fairly new when we applied, so the way things were usually done hadn't become the only way they could be done. We also got an exception to UHC's waiting list policies. Initially this was merely that people on the waiting list could turn our units down without losing their place on the list (to avoid our getting someone who regarded the community as the unit's worst drawback). After several people had declined the units, UHC quit sending us candidates; instead they give preference for the units to candidates that we send them (who still have to qualify by the usual rules). Kay A Wasatch Commons Salt Lake City __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4798 (20100122) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated", (continued)
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Karen Carlson, January 21 2010
- affordable cohousing, not "gated" Karen Kudia, January 22 2010
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Joanie Connors, January 22 2010
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Sharon Villines, January 22 2010
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Kay Argyle, January 22 2010
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Marganne Meyer, January 22 2010
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Marganne Meyer, January 22 2010
- Re: affordable cohousing, not "gated" Marganne Meyer, January 22 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.