Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Eris Weaver (eris![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:57:32 -0800 (PST) |
> I meant that the voting in this particular situation was less divisive than > forging on to try to reach consensus because it was clear that opinions had > polarized. We didn't see a clear path out of this and toward consensus. > That's not to say that there wouldn't have been a way to reach > consensus. It > was simply that we didn't have one in our toolkit. This is a very astute observation about your process! I find that a useful tool when a group is stuck in polarity is to step back from discussing SOLUTIONS to gain more clarity and agreement on motivations, goals, and the ultimate purpose behind whatever proposal is being discussed. If folks are seeing and experiencing the underlying issues in completely different ways, of course there can be no commonality in the solution. Stepping back to discuss our values, our needs, our concerns - the WHY behind what we're doing rather than the details of WHAT we should do - can be useful. There may still be disagreement, but often once people feel that they have been heard and their perspective has been valued, they are more willing to give up one particular course of action and the creativity starts to flow, with new possibilities being suggested that might meet more people's needs. My own community often starts the discussion about a heavy topic with a brainstorm session about our hopes and fears about the issue, with the two lists being scribed side by side. We don't talk solutions or actions or specifics of a proposal, but what do each of us hope for and what are we afraid might happen. Then we look at the two lists - and frequently there will be an item that appears on BOTH the hope and fear list! Then we know that THAT will be the sticky spot, where there is the most difference in values/wants/needs, and where we need to work the most to find creative solutions. ------------------------------ Eris Weaver, Facilitator & Group Process Consultant FrogSong (Cotati, CA) eris [at] erisweaver.info 707-338-8589 http://www.erisweaver.info fa cil' i tāt: to make easier
- Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting, (continued)
- Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting Sharon Villines, February 27 2010
- Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting Ann Zabaldo, February 27 2010
- Consensus [was balance] - voting Brian Tremback, February 27 2010
- Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting Eris Weaver, February 28 2010
- Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting Eris Weaver, February 28 2010
- Personality Factors vs. Preference for Consensus Decision-Making Norman Gauss, February 28 2010
-
Personality Factors vs. Consensus Norman Gauss, February 28 2010
- Groups using Consensus are generally happy Norman Gauss, February 28 2010
- Re: Consensus [was balance] - voting R.N. Johnson, February 28 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.