Re: A strategy for affordability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David L. Mandel (dlmandel![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT) |
Using a CLT or any other limited equity (e.g. LE coop) model requires disconnecting from the notion that housing, in addition to providing a home, should also be treated as an investment necessary for one's financial future or that of one's heirs. That goes against the grain of our "privatize everything" social order, and making the opposite ethos widespread will require a larger transformation, but it can work to some degree in relatively small numbers. For those who have a decent income, the lower monthly cost can make possible other savings that can be invested for retirement, education, etc. For truly low income people, a limited equity development may well make possible home ownership that would otherwise be out of reach altogether. In exchange, they (and other participants) forgo the slim possibility that a new housing bubble might "enrich" them. I personally find that tradeoff attractive. One of the ways our ruling elite keeps us from rebelling is by perpetuating the myth that anyone with the right combination of luck and smarts can get rich. Sure, a few can, but the system is built on exploitation of most of us and impoverishment of far too many. David Mandel --- On Sun, 5/16/10, Fred H Olson <fholson [at] cohousing.org> wrote: From: Fred H Olson <fholson [at] cohousing.org> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ A strategy for affordability To: "Cohousing-L mailing list" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Date: Sunday, May 16, 2010, 6:30 AM Richard, thanks for the pointer to The Community Land Trust Reader see http://j.mp/cJZrpy ( which goes to: http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/1776_New-Book-Announcement--The-Community-Land-Trust-Reader ) Community Land Trusts (CLT) have been discussed on Cohousing-L from time to time. But things have changed. One of the main problems with CLT's is that since CLT's are few in number in the US, moving from one to another can be difficult. This may result in having to go back into the regular housing market where housing prices may have inflated leaving one's equity short since CLTs limit price inflation. But the housing market meltdown has clearly shown that planning on housing inflation can be problematic too. I too find Brian's reply odd. Particularly his example: > used travel trailer for a few thousand dollars, and park it in a > friend's suburban backyard for perhaps nothing. However I do sort of agree with his conclusion: > If low and moderate income folks are having trouble affording a > house, the problem is NOT the cost of building it. A main problem is the market that, till recently, pushes prices very high in many places. It bewilders me how people afford housing prices in some places. This is what CLT's address. Fred who has lived in the same house for 33 years, one strategy is to stay in the same place for a long time. -- YEA! (& boo) 3/23/10 Health Care Reform Passed! See my Blog entry. Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 USA (near north Mpls) Communications for Justice -- Free, superior listserv's w/o ads: http://justcomm.org ; My Link Pg: http://fholson.cohousing.org 612-588-9532 (7am-10pm CST/CDT) Email: fholson at cohousing.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: A strategy for affordability, (continued)
-
Re: A strategy for affordability Richart Keller, May 16 2010
- Re: A strategy for affordability Brian Bartholomew, May 17 2010
- Re: A strategy for affordability Joanie Connors, May 17 2010
- Re: A strategy for affordability Brian Bartholomew, May 17 2010
-
Re: A strategy for affordability Richart Keller, May 16 2010
- Re: A strategy for affordability bb, May 16 2010
- Re: A strategy for affordability Marganne Meyer, May 17 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.