Re: right of first refusal - discriminatory history | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:39:21 -0700 (PDT) |
On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Michael Barrett wrote:
I imagine banks keep away from rights of first refusal so that they can't beaccused of any association with discrimination.
Bankers are extremely conservative. I think they would be more likely to believe those radical non-discriminators were a bad investment.
They are looking at the money end -- is their investment potentially at risk.
The point Diana makes about the HOA not closing and the original buyer being gone is a good one.
The problem is that if the bylaws said that the closing had to take place in the shortest amount of time possible -- 2 weeks? -- the blanket rule wouldn't allow protections for the bank. The community would have to have all the funds in the bank or some kind of blanket mortgage agreement in place.
Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
right of first refusal - discriminatory history Kristen Simmons, August 4 2010
-
Re: right of first refusal - discriminatory history Michael Barrett, August 4 2010
- Re: right of first refusal - discriminatory history Sharon Villines, August 4 2010
- Re: right of first refusal - discriminatory history Alexander Robin A, August 4 2010
-
Re: right of first refusal - discriminatory history Michael Barrett, August 4 2010
- Message not available
-
Re: right of first refusal David Pierce, August 4 2010
- Re: right of first refusal Diana Carroll, August 4 2010
- Re: right of first refusal Sharon Villines, August 4 2010
-
Re: right of first refusal David Pierce, August 4 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.