Social behavior Re: Urban farming Coho
From: Wayne Tyson (landrestcox.net)
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 12:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, Karen; I think that idea has a lot of merit, and wouldn't try to change it. I will look into it.

I suspect that a lot of diversity will provide the differentiation needed for the radiation phase of adaptation in a lot of different contexts. The central purpose of my enquiry here is to learn what has worked and hasn't worked in which contexts so that we can get better at predicting potential errors, omissions, and needs in different contexts.

Of course, one of those contexts is individual and group psychology/attitudes and dynamics, and how all those factors integrate, form and re-form and refine in a continuous feedback loop of adaptation to change. And yes, there is security in rigidity, but there also is a price to pay.

As money and other resources become ever more concentrated in a smaller and smaller percentage of the population, co-housing and other ways of surviving the coming Depression and/or Inflation will have to become a way of life for a greater and greater number of the late, lamented "middle-class." Either way, consumption will go down, and all but the top wealth-accumulators will be forced to live according to their needs rather than their desires. Within that subset, I suspect that those who are less dependent upon institutional entities will be more able to flex with the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune that are thus magnified.

If there is a perfected solution to a rational life out there, I'd like to learn about it. If there isn't, I want to understand what makes the best of the various ones work as well as they do, but also about their flaws. And I would like to learn about those that are not working well and why, and the failures and what caused them to fail.

I am very much in a learning/questioning mode, and look forward to further discussion and learning of cases and case-studies from those who care to share them.

WT


----- Original Message ----- From: <kkudia [at] peoplepc.com>
To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Urban farming Coho



Wayne:

Just a thought. Read last month that Orange Splott LLC is a Portland, Oregon
CoHo developer (Rick Spevak). They have or are going to propose the model:
"Farm within the City" model on less than 2 acres.  I think similar to his
other developments like Peninsular Park Commons etc. CoHo folks from Oregon will probably be more knowledgeable about this. What I found interesting is
the focus on farming in an urban setting: great model. At least more ideas
to put in the mix as you are thinking through your project. Ties in with
with Rick's response.

Karen
Anthony FL



Message: 3
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 21:19:56 -0700
From: "Wayne Tyson" <landrest [at] cox.net>
Subject: [C-L]_ Social behavior Re: FIRST POST Questions and sort of
statement

Thanks for the response.
The environmental and social record of conventional building and planning
is largely one of tragic
error.

I look forward to further discussion.

WT



While I understand the desire to be in a rural, the planet really needs
compact developments which are located in such a way as to minimize
vehicle miles traveled.  To minimize CO2 emissions and increase the
market for
mass transit (bus, light rail, etc.) have you thought about locating
within a
designated urban growth boundary area or in or at the edge of an existing
metropolitan area?

Cohousing has so many benefits which are consistent with (and even models
of) good sustainability practices, it strengthens its influence if the
planning takes location into account.

Rick


Richart Keller, AICP

120 Pulpit Hill Road #27
Amherst, MA 01002
413-835-0011
401 486-2677 (cell)




_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3113 - Release Date: 09/04/10 06:34:00


Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.