Re: To Go or Not To Go---Cohousing and CoHo US | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:59:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Apart from the question of whether such a thing as "no ideology"
exists, it's quite clear
even from the discussions of this issue on this list that MANY MANY
cohousers care about unions,
and that the possibility of crossing a picket line might keep
substantial numbers away.
So, in and of itself, that should have compelled a discussion of this
issue by the organizers - on the basis
of self-interest (ie: getting as many people as possible to show up at
the conference.), if not
out of taking a position on the union struggle. Racheli Sonora cohousing, Tucson.On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:42 AM, <kkudia [at] peoplepc.com> <kkudia [at] peoplepc.com> wrote:
Katie: Well said. I tend to concur: the primary commitment of CoHo as an organization is the shared commitment of building neighborhoods. Individuals are free to pursue a variety of political/religious persuasions and socialissues (women rights, animalrights, poverty/racial issues, poverty in developing countries, sustainableagriculture etc) and I imagine this organization likeothers are composed of such a mixture. Perhaps the strength of CoHo is itsclear focus. Karen Anthony FlI?ve been troubled by this whole union situation for several reasons:1. By definition, cohousing is not supposed to have a shared ideology.Cohousers claim to want a diverse range of political and social viewpoints, butof course the vast majority of cohousers are lefty liberals and anyone who doesn?t share that perspective doesn?t really fit in. I can understand and respect why individual members would not want to attend the conference andcrossa picket line, but why is support for organized labor even an issue forthe association? It?s not part of any mission statement or platform. >It?s regrettable that this union issue seems to be putting a damper on the conference and possibly causing people to not attend. I commend the boardfor trying in good faith to work with the union, but the main goal ? the reasonwe?re all here ? is to support and advance the cause of cohousing, and Ithink the board made the right decision to carry on with the conference. Katie Henry_________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
Re: To Go or Not To Go---Cohousing and CoHo US kkudia, June 6 2011
- Re: To Go or Not To Go---Cohousing and CoHo US Racheli Gai, June 6 2011
-
Re: The "ideology" thing Racheli Gai, June 6 2011
-
Re: The "ideology" thing Wayne Tyson, June 6 2011
- Re: The "ideology" thing Racheli Gai, June 6 2011
- Re: The "ideology" thing Wayne Tyson, June 6 2011
-
Re: The "ideology" thing Wayne Tyson, June 6 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.