Re: financial diversity (WAS Development Phase) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:31:18 -0700 (PDT) |
On 23 Sep 2011, at 12:30 PM, Eris Weaver wrote: > Greater diversity = greater opportunity for conflict! And what the idealistic cohousers that we are all, we come right up against this soon after move-in, if our diversity allows us to move in at all. I wonder what people think diversity is? We've talked before about how many different kinds of diversity there are - not just ethnic or financial, but we forget that with skin color, social class, and income levels come values. God forbid we would have a Republican (did anyone ever locate one?). Liberals seem to assume that we differ in ways that bring richness to our lives, and forget that those differences result in or are the result of fundamentally different lifestyles and values. When you are trying to make decisions together differing values = conflict. People have different aims. When people have different aims, consensus is not always possible. When it comes to yes, no, and maybe, diversity = conflict. Unfortunately, we aren't so patient with working through conflict to find mutually satisfying solutions. And sometimes it isn't possible when we live in such close quarters and are so interdepedent. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
financial diversity (WAS Development Phase) Eris Weaver, September 23 2011
- Re: financial diversity (WAS Development Phase) Diane, September 24 2011
- Re: financial diversity (WAS Development Phase) Sharon Villines, September 24 2011
- Re: financial diversity (WAS Development Phase) Richard L. Kohlhaas, September 24 2011
- Community Reformation Re: financial diversity (WAS Development Phase) Wayne Tyson, September 25 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.