Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:48:23 -0700 (PDT) |
In other words, anyone can show up at any [including committee or task force] meeting, anytime, and enjoy all equal privileges of talking, consensing, and blocking. Third, we have requirements that any such meeting be properly noticed in advance, with an agenda that is more than telegraphic buzz-phrases, and that meeting minutes re decisions taken, plus any relevant documentation, get posted to the community. ...So I don't know if this meets the standards of a discussion circle, but it feels pretty open to me.
This, and a number of other posts, seem to focus on the individual letting others know their opinion. The best-case discussion circle evolves opinions. A first go-round airs the opinions and concerns people arrive with. Almost always, a later round shows changes: "Now that I heard what Joe said,..." , "I hadn't thought of what Sue suggested,,," and not uncommonly, opinions may flip significantly.
Maraiah Lynn Nadeau RoseWind Cohousing, Port Townsend WA
-
Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Moz, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 26 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, September 26 2011
-
Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 26 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 26 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 26 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Kay Argyle, September 28 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.