Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Moz (listmoz.geek.nz) | |
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT) |
> Does the consensus process lend itself to sub-communities? > ... finds itself consistently split into factions ... I think that's more about cohousing of itself. Other consensus-based groups often split as a way of resolving these conflicts. There have been a few cities with more than one indymedia site, for instance, and there have been at least two "polite critical mass" groups. Usually they merge back after a while, but that's often because the people involved have lost interest or moved away. Not really a solution for coho. But splitting within a cohousing community wouldn't seem likely to me. The problem is more with the way decisions are made, and that's not really something you can split over. Having a democratic faction and a consensus faction meeting to finalise or confirm a decision would be ... interesting. Moz
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks", (continued)
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Moz, October 5 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Racheli Gai, October 18 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Moz, October 18 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Dane Laverty, October 18 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Moz, October 18 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Sharon Villines, October 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Wayne Tyson, October 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Mary Ann Clark, October 6 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.