Re: Reserve Studies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:10:07 -0800 (PST) |
On 29 Dec 2011, at 12:19 PM, Holly McNutt wrote: > But I wonder if there is a general rule of thumb that most communities > follow in terms of how much they should have tucked away. Like how healthy > is healthy? The financial figures in your reserve study should tell you how much you will need each year and include a spreadsheet and graph showing what amount is projected to be needed each year. The reason to do a yearly recalculation is to adjust contributions if there have been unexpected replacements or large replacements have not been needed. I can't imagine that any community has an overfunded reserve, but according to the Reserve Study industry, a strong community will be 70%-100% funded. Association Reserves (see next message) recommends 100% because then you are prepared for the unexpected. If you want an affordable community, you want to be as fully funded as possible. While many on the edge households only look at the cash flow this month, their boat would be sunk if they had a special assessment. The older your community is, the more likely it is to have unexpected, high replacement costs, and the higher the costs, them more difficult it will be to come up with them. It's like not saving for college until your child is 16. This is the link to the Association Reserves entries on percent funded: http://www.reservestudy.com/?x=0&y=0&s=percent+funded When communities are 40-50% funded, the chances of having a special assessment are 10%. At 10-20% funded, 40%. I think these numbers would change if they were controlled for the age of the community. In addition to the problem of special assessments there is the issue of deferring maintenance. If the funds are not available for necessary replacement of the roof shingles or siding, for example, the internal structure can be damaged by water and pest infiltration. Association Reserves has found that this begins to happen at 40% funded — in other words 60% underfunded. Cohousers have often come out of the mind-set that we are different. This attitude has helped many communities to overcome huge obstacles, but buildings are not attitudes. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Reserve Studies, (continued)
- Re: Reserve Studies Christine Johnson, August 23 2007
-
Re: Reserve Studies Douglas G. Larson, December 29 2011
- Re: Reserve Studies Karen Carlson, December 29 2011
-
Re: Reserve Studies Holly McNutt, December 29 2011
- Re: Reserve Studies Sharon Villines, December 29 2011
- Re: Reserve Studies CORRECTION Sharon Villines, December 29 2011
- Re: Reserve Studies Diana Carroll, December 29 2011
-
Re: Reserve Studies Sharon Villines, December 29 2011
- Re: Reserve Studies R Philip Dowds, December 30 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.