Re: Men in Cohousing (was "Call for journalist interviewing cohousers") | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dane Laverty (danelaverty![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:50:14 -0700 (PDT) |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:27 AM, G/P Looney-Burman < burloon [at] fresnocohousing.org> wrote: > > Our counter to that ("You always have privacy when you want it") was never > really accepted or believed > Kind of off topic, but I find that when I tell people about cohousing, this is their response too. I explain how it provides both private and public space, but people's brains immediately flip the cult/commune switch and can't comprehend that it's not that different from having your own home/condo. That said, I'm afraid cohousing has kind of brought that on itself by going with "cohousing" as a moniker. The term immediately conjures up images of people living communally together in a house. If it were called something else (I don't know what...I'll have to think up some terms), I think it would be easier to sell the idea to socially cautious Americans. D
-
Men in Cohousing (was "Call for journalist interviewing cohousers") G/P Looney-Burman, March 19 2012
- Re: Men in Cohousing (was "Call for journalist interviewing cohousers") Beverly Jones Redekop, March 19 2012
- Re: Men in Cohousing (was "Call for journalist interviewing cohousers") Dane Laverty, March 19 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.