Re: CC & R interpretation and compliance?
From: Christine Johnson (manzjohnsonnetzero.net)
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
"Cathy Snow" <cathysnow [at] comcast.net> wrote:


Our CC & R's include a vague reference to keeping ones home in good repair
and in a neat and clean condition, but who determines what that means?

In typical homeowner or condominium owners association (HOA/COA), either management or a compliance committee or the two acting in concert, perform regular property inspections and follow a protocol for enforcement. The protocol for enforcement is typically stated in a policy which had been approved by the the Board of Directors. In our community and I bet in most cohousing communities, we've not put such compliance structures and policies in place. As a result, we sort through each concern, making or not making decisions on a case by case basis.

How do we balance the desire to respect different situations and personal preferences, while still ensuring the safety of individuals and protection
of the overall property?

Where there are formal policies in place and where there is a structure for effecting enforcement and where owners are treated equitably in being subject to the policies, the Board has the discretion to make allowances for individual's circumstances, documenting in the Minutes all the reasons why.


One idea we had was to have our buildings team due an annual inspection - inside and out - of the units to ensure smoke detectors are installed and working, no foundational issues are occurring, and that no other safety /
health /cleanliness/ maintenance issues exist..

This is an excellent plan because it is routine (annual), you are using a criteria that would apply equitably to all the owners, and it is impersonal, so you don't run the risk of being charged with "selective enforcement".

HOA and COA Boards get a lot of bad press for 'selective enforcement' and sadly, it is often deserved. Absent routine practices for determining whether someone is in compliance or not and absent specific policies for working with non-compliant owners, it's difficult to defend enforcement actions that can appear to be directed to (i.e., against) one individual or family.

But we would be very
interested in hearing from any of you who have had to deal with similar
situations.  Or any of you who simply have ideas to share!

I think in cohousing in general, we've elected to go with resolving "compliance with the rules" issues on a case by case basis, with folks who are willing to assist a non-compliant owner, jumping in to help resolve the situation. Another informal method is plain old social pressure. Those of us who choose to live in cohousing, as a rule, value our relationships with neighbors and social pressure probably has a greater influence in our communities than in a typical HOA/COA. Another common practice is to ignore it (such as a trashy front porch). It's just not that important in the larger scheme of things. We're I given a choice between a tidy, well run HOA/COA with strict enforcement in place and a messy cohousing community, I'd again choose the latter.

Christine Johnson
Stone Curves Cohousing
Tucson, AZ ____________________________________________________________
53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/4f7c839929fe02a7bast06vuc

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.