Re: Group size Re: Co-farming in the Cities | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Don Benson (benson6451![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Optimum is a function of a variety of expectations. Based on the content of the recent Survey of Co-housing Communities and the growing emphasis by developers and others on co-housing for seniors, it would appear that notion of "optimum" may need some clarification for you. You might find some help in thinking this through at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_action_theory_and_interorganizational_systems Don Benson Trillium Hollow 503.296.7249 On May 12, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Wayne Tyson wrote: > > Sharon, can you (or anyone) direct me to some references on optimum group > size studies? How did the Australians determine that 500 was optimum? This > is the largest number I've come across, 150 being the lowest. Have there > been any anthropological studies focused on comparative group size in > self-sufficient cultures unaffected by "advanced" outside cultures? > > Thanks for any help. > > WT > > > >
-
Co-farming in the Cities Thomas Lofft, May 10 2012
-
Re: Co-farming in the Cities Sharon Villines, May 11 2012
-
Group size Re: Co-farming in the Cities Wayne Tyson, May 12 2012
- Re: Group size Re: Co-farming in the Cities Don Benson, May 12 2012
- Re: Group size Re: Co-farming in the Cities Sharon Villines, May 12 2012
-
Group size Re: Co-farming in the Cities Wayne Tyson, May 12 2012
-
Re: Co-farming in the Cities R Philip Dowds, May 12 2012
- Number of Units [ was Co-farming in the Cities] Sharon Villines, May 12 2012
- Re: Number of Units [ was Co-farming in the Cities] R Philip Dowds, May 12 2012
-
Re: Co-farming in the Cities Sharon Villines, May 11 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.