Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Magill (pastorlizm![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:28:01 -0800 (PST) |
> There's another issue that ties in w/ this whole thing. HOmes that meet > the affordability guidelines are awarded close to the time the take out > mortgages are secured -- this is at the END of the development process. So > ... these folks are likely not going to be part of the earlier process of > organizing the community. This is great if you need buyers at the end and > your remaining homes meet the affordability requirement. But what about the > people who work from the beginning? Will they be able to get the affordable > homes? And will people work for 2+ years w/out a guarantee of getting an > affordable home? My experience has been that people needing an affordable or > low cost home want it or need it NOW ... they don't have two years to invest > w/out a guarantee of owning a home. We had one household stick with us for years hoping that she'd get a lottery home. There was a vague sense that we'd "make it work" if she didn't get chosen, but it was angst producing. And her status changed while she was in the project (starting from able to afford market rate to life situation that made her instead in the affordable lottery) so she already had superior buy-in before the life change. It is TOTALLY true that it is hard for the people qualifying for the affordable lottery to be part of the development phase. I'd be interested to know how many cohousing developments in the last five or six years have actually only had, or even primarily had, developers of the community be buyers of the homes. > So in your case, Elizabeth, you were/are ACTIVELY LOOKING for buyers. You > needed buyers. In this case, this worked for you. Yes, yes. Also the economy we built in, and all sorts of other details. I was only stating that rejecting municipal and state affordable housing programs automatically because they use lists or lotteries is a mistake. In each situation each community needs to figure how those housing lists and lotteries and other rules impact their specific situation. (AND why you need an experience developer who knows your area and cohousing to help make the project happen.) > > Elizabeth -- what criteria did you use to approve or disapprove membership at > Mosaic? What has been other folks's experience w/ approving or disapproving > members? >> In my opinion the number of mis-matches in the two systems of joining was >> exactly the same. And the percent of market rate and affordable mis-matches >> are the same as well. > > Well. We won't know for sure until we have real data AND I take your word > that this is what it seems for you. I don't actually know that we had criteria. I was opposed to the system all along (it was in place before I was voted in) and thus must admit that I don't look at it with an open mind!!! > My other question for you, Liz, is why you still have 4 affordable homes > left? Just curious as to why the affordability programs in your area have > not produced buyers for you. It's probably a complicated answer -- and I'm > just curious. No other motive here. :-) > Ann Z. The biggest answer (in my totally biased opinion) is that the Mass state 40B system has very difficult eligibility requirements. Among other difficulties: if, for example, your income limit is $54,000 for your household, then you need to make at least, say, $52,500 to qualify for the mortgage..... . So ALMOST ALL of the 40B affordable home lotteries have had less applicants than homes. The people in our community who have been approved have been very hardworking, smart people who can follow pages and pages of directions, find the little exceptions here and there, run out and get a part-time second job of exactly the right sort, etc., etc., etc.. The second biggest answer is that the housing market fell apart just before our homes were completed. There are foreclosed homes all around for about $40K more than our affordable homes, and come with no income restrictions or resale limits... -Liz Elizabeth Magill www.sawyerhill.org Join us in the snow! 3BRs homes for $173,000. 2BR home for $154,500.
- Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story..., (continued)
-
Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Fred H Olson, December 29 2012
-
Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Ann Zabaldo, December 29 2012
- Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Elizabeth Magill, December 29 2012
- Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Ann Zabaldo, December 29 2012
- Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Elizabeth Magill, December 29 2012
- Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Doug Huston, December 29 2012
-
Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Ann Zabaldo, December 29 2012
-
Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Fred H Olson, December 29 2012
- Re: Creating more affordable cohousing - a personal story... Sharon Villines, December 29 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.