Re: We ditched consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:50:52 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sep 13, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Sean Davey <sean [at] sonoracohousing.com> wrote: >> The idea of the automated agenda is revolutionary! > the goal behind it is to increase democratization of decision making and help > people feel > more involved and less removed from the process. So we are now at the point where majority vote is considered revolutionary and democratizing. It sounds like people have not been using consensus successfully, for no fault necessarily of consensus, but they weren't able to make it work for them. The test is to measure and ensure that when majority vote doesn't produce the result that people both successful and included another option is considered. Like consensus. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: We ditched consensus, (continued)
- Re: We ditched consensus Racheli Gai, September 12 2013
-
Re: We ditched consensus Diana Carroll, September 12 2013
- Re: We ditched consensus Racheli Gai, September 12 2013
-
Re: We ditched consensus Sean Davey, September 13 2013
- Re: We ditched consensus Sharon Villines, September 13 2013
- Re: We ditched consensus Racheli Gai, September 14 2013
- Consensus Definitions [was We ditched consensus Sharon Villines, September 14 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.