Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Chris ScottHanson (cscotthanson![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:15:39 -0800 (PST) |
What about... Adaptive reuse cohousing neighborhood? Chris ScottHanson (206)601-7802 > On Dec 11, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Kathryn McCamant <kmccamant [at] > cohousingpartners.com> wrote: > > > Interesting discussion. > > I don't think Neighborhood Cohousing makes sense to distinguish "retrofit" > from other newly built cohousing neighborhoods. As others have mentioned, > they are all based creating a more collaborative neighborhood. I have been > trying to change my own language to say cohousing neighborhoods generally, > instead of cohousing communities... I think the term neighborhood makes it > clearer that people have individual homes, as opposed to a shared house or > cohome... > > Not sure what the best term is... We are use to having to define cohousing > when we use it. I expect that just about any term we use to distinguish > retrofit cohousing will also need ongoing defining for many people. I've > been using the term retrofit cohousing for decades and find it works fine, > or at least as well as any term for a concept most people still can't > imagine. > > Katie > > -- > Kathryn McCamant, President, Architect > CoHousing Partners, LLC > 241 Commercial Street > Nevada City, CA 95959 > T.530.478.1970 C.916.798.4755 > www.cohousingpartners.com > > > > > >> On 12/8/13 8:36 AM, "Kevin Wolf" <kevin [at] wolfandassociates.com> wrote: >> >> >> Thanks Ann and Diana for chiming in. >> >> It seems most build choosing is a subset of the neighborhood and has a >> pretty specific footprint that sometimes grows by adding neighboring >> houses >> but most often it doesn't. One real world experience from N Street >> Cohousing is that if we had thought of ourselves as a community that could >> incorporated non-contiguous houses in the neighborhood from the start, we >> would have grown faster and not lost as many members who left the >> community >> because there weren't any contiguous houses. Having the goal be part of >> the name has its benefits. >> >> The names "Evolving Cohousing" and "Organic Cohousing" have advantages as >> well and could work as well. I don't think Infiltrated Cohousing or "In >> Place Cohousing" work as they don't express as clearly the vision or the >> method by which this type of cohousing differs from from "built" >> cohousing. >> >> Kevin >> >> >>> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Ann Zabaldo <zabaldo [at] earthlink.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi Kevin! >>> >>> I don't know what the term should be to describe cohousing that starts >>> with an existing neighborhood but I welcome the discussion. I, too, >>> have >>> often found "retrofit" to be a confusing term. >>> >>> Thanks for bringing this discussion to the list. >>> >>> Best -- >>> >>> Ann Zabaldo >>> Takoma Village Cohousing >>> Washington, DC >>> Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC >>> Falls Church VA >>> 703-688-2646 >>> >>>> On Dec 8, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Cohousing Activists, >>>> >>>> I just finished speaking at the UK Cohousing Network's special >>> conference >>>> on Retrofit Cohousing. They invited me because N Street Cohousing is >>> a >>>> premier example of how existing homes can be converted over time into >>> a >>>> vibrant cohousing community. We have grown to 20+ houses and around >>> 60 >>>> adults in the 25 years we have considered ourselves a cohousing >>> community. >>>> >>>> One thing that came out of this excellent event is the awareness that >>> there >>>> are problems with the word "retrofit" to describe what N Street and >>> other >>>> similar types of communities are doing. We found out that people did >>> not >>>> attend because they thought it was about retrofiting existing >>> buildings >>>> into built choosing, similar to Doyle Street and Swans Market >>> Cohousing >>>> here in CA. >>>> >>>> The word retrofit also doesn't describe the many ways in which "non >>> built" >>>> cohousing can develop and evolve. "Built" cohousing is defined as all >>> the >>>> units coming on line more or less at the same time as one project. >>>> >>>> One of the speakers at the UK conference described her group's effort >>> to >>>> buy homes in an inexpensive neighbourhood near Cardiff and evolve that >>> into >>>> cohousing in the years to come. Few of the members would have >>> contiguous >>>> homes. They'd like to buy a home near the entrance to the >>> neighbourhood >>> and >>>> convert it into a common house with possible use as a cafe during the >>> day >>>> to help pay for it. It might also be rented out for non members to >>> use as >>>> well. It is a different strategy to achieve the same goals as all of >>> us >>>> want to achieve in our cohousing communities. In my opinion, the >>> goals >>> we >>>> are pursuing are more important than the specific means by which we >>> achieve >>>> them, and the core elements of a cohousing community are a common >>> house >>> and >>>> the gifting of our time cooking meals for each other. >>>> >>>> So after the conference a few of us met for dinner and came up with a >>> new >>>> proposed word to describe the type of cohousing the grows over time >>> and >>> is >>>> not built all at once - Neighborhood Cohousing. We considered words >>> like >>>> Evolving Cohousing or Starting Small Cohousing but like the >>> robustness >>> of >>>> the word Neighborhood and all the potential in it. >>>> >>>> By the way, N Street member houses have been spreading out over our >>>> neighborhood with five of them no longer being contiguous and one of >>> them >>>> at least a block away, and a long time Friend of the Community (one of >>> our >>>> FOCers) lives a few blocks away. >>>> >>>> We'd like to spark a discussion with the U.S cohousing community on >>> whether >>>> we should change from the word Retrofit to Neighborhood or another >>> word >>> to >>>> define N Street types of cohousing from communities as being different >>> from >>>> cohousing communities that are built all at once from retrofitted old >>>> buildings. >>>> >>>> Thank you for weighing in. >>>> >>>> Kevin >>>> N Street Cohousing co-founder >>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing, (continued)
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing R Philip Dowds, December 11 2013
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Sharon Villines, December 11 2013
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Mariana Almeida, December 11 2013
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Karen Scheer, December 12 2013
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Chris ScottHanson, December 11 2013
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Laura Fitch, December 8 2013
-
Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Ann Zabaldo, December 8 2013
- Re: "Neighborhood" Cohousing or "Retrofit" Cohousing Four Cat House, December 8 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.