| Re: Shared community internet service | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds comcast.net)
|
|
| Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:24:08 -0700 (PDT) | |
At Cornerstone, the big obstacle is neither technological complexity nor vendor greed. It is an unwillingness to be part of communal funding of services and equipment needed and used differentially. In many cases, we seem more comfortable with privatization and/or pay-per-use. While we would all benefit -- even if partially or selectively -- from a shared vehicle, a shared ISP, shared periodical subscriptions, a communal TV or digital projector, and so on, we never quite get over the hump of committing communal money. Our solution is for households to support the community, rather than the community to support the households. Philip Dowds > On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > wrote: > > A major conundrum for cohousing and one that warrants a chapter in the next > book on building a cohousing community.
- Re: Shared community internet service, (continued)
-
Re: Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
-
Re: Shared community internet service Diana Carroll, April 1 2014
- Re: Shared community internet service Richard L. Kohlhaas, April 1 2014
- Re: Shared community internet service Jim Snyder-Grant, April 1 2014
-
Re: Shared community internet service Diana Carroll, April 1 2014
- Re: Shared community internet service R Philip Dowds, April 1 2014
- Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Elizabeth Magill, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service R.P. Aditya, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
-
Re: Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.