Re: FHA Approval | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:49:20 -0700 (PDT) |
On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Diana Carroll <dianaecarroll [at] gmail.com> wrote: > There are so many entities involves in the home mortgage transaction that I > don't think it makes sense to say "stand up for your rights, they can't > discriminate". Mortgage lenders and guarantors vary hugely in the amount > of due diligence they do, how risk averse they are, and even what their > actual goals are. But the FHA is not a private bank. It's a Federal Agency. If they are discriminating it should be on the basis of written and transparent rules/standards. Not hidden and not in writing. And it should be fairly exercised across all housing groups. The rules/standard should also be fairly determined based on factual evidence. As we all know, cohousing is probably the lowest insurance risk of any class of housing for which a bank would be applying for insurance. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Elegance in Organization http://www.sociocracy.info
- Re: FHA Approval, (continued)
- Re: FHA Approval Kathryn McCamant, March 31 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Kay Wilson Fisk, March 31 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Ann Zabaldo, March 31 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Diana Carroll, April 1 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Sharon Villines, April 2 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Diana Carroll, April 2 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Diana Carroll, April 1 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Sharon Villines, April 2 2014
- Re: FHA Approval Sharon Villines, April 2 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.