| Legal underpinning of Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Thomas Lofft (tlofft |
|
| Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:11:21 -0700 (PDT) | |
Sarah Wells of Highline Crossing in Littleton, CO, wrote:
"Recently we passed a participation in lieu of pay agreement but in the
implementation were challenged by a neighbor new to living here about its
legality. In response, we sought legal advice from a well known HOA law firm
in the area. After reading our CC & Rs and all of our cohousing agreements,
this firm stated definitively that Cohousing is illegal and we need to just
hire a management firm to serve our property. Needless to say, the
conversation in our community isn't over but we are wondering how other
communities have set up their legal documents to support their cohousing
processes and agreements to handle similar challenges."
I ask if your esteemed counsel was able and willing to quote the specific laws
and segments thereof that they thought were violated by your cohousing CC&R's,
or how Cohousing is illegal in principal, and how your CC&R's or cohousing in
principal contravenes those laws?
In my mind, nothing is illegal until it has been brought to consideration in an
appropriate courtroom and decided by the judicial system past all rights of
appeal.
Does your counsel have case law references?
Tom Lofft
Liberty Village, MD
-
Legal underpinning of Cohousing Sarah Wells, May 11 2014
-
Re: Legal underpinning of Cohousing Fred H Olson, May 11 2014
-
Re: Legal underpinning of Cohousing Sharon Villines, May 11 2014
- Re: Legal underpinning of Cohousing Sharon Villines, May 11 2014
-
Re: Legal underpinning of Cohousing Sharon Villines, May 11 2014
- Legal underpinning of Cohousing Thomas Lofft, May 12 2014
-
Re: Legal underpinning of Cohousing Fred H Olson, May 11 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.