Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R.P. Aditya (aditya![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 12:19:25 -0700 (PDT) |
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 10:01:51AM -0400, Richart Keller wrote: > I suspect that Great Oaks approach reflects that of most cohousing > communities. I was under the impression that in most communities the meals work is separate from other community work and the only folks who need to do meals work are those that dine -- I've certainly observed first-hand in the cohousing communities I've visited that to be a big problem in contrast to the Great Oak approach of having meals work integrated in the community work system and making just the dining part optional. btw, there is only one Oak tree that deserves to be called "Great" on the property :-) -- Adi Great Oak Cohousing Ann Arbor, MI, USA http://www.gocoho.org
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation?, (continued)
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Sharon Villines, August 3 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Diana Carroll, August 3 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? R.P. Aditya, August 3 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Richart Keller, August 4 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? R.P. Aditya, August 4 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Sharon Villines, August 4 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Pat Elliott, August 9 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Muriel Kranowski, August 10 2014
- Re: Subject: Common meals - mandatory participation? Kay Wilson Fisk, August 10 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.