Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Diana Carroll (dianaecarroll![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:58:21 -0700 (PDT) |
Mosaic commons meal program is voluntary and we have 3-4 meals a week most weeks. I also think it's pretty popular. On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Jenny Guy <jenstermeister [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > What an interesting thread, so many takes on meals programs! > Congratulations to Songaia for having such a robust meals program while > being totally voluntary. It looks like the other voluntary systems don't > have as many meals, but if the casual atmosphere is more important than > frequent meals, then that sounds like a great fit. I'm also impressed that > 2 communities reported having people who just love cooking for everyone, so > everyone gets to eat, without having to cook. > > WRT the original question, my thought would be not to throw out a mandatory > program that's working for most, but maybe negotiate with the folks who > don't like participating in meals, to see if there's alternative work they > can do. I would think it might work to try this out as a 'special > arrangement', rather than throwing it open to everyone. And, as a couple of > people have mentioned, it would really depend on why they don't like the > meals program. It's unusual to really dislike both cooking and cleaning up. > > Sharon, I do agree that one good approach would be to have cooking just be > one of the jobs in the workshare program, as long as there ended up being > enough cooks. I think it might hinge on how many people wanted to cook; > you'd want to be careful not to end up with no meals. > > And that gets into one of life's big issues, how much can you do the work > you love and are good at, and how much do you have to knuckle down and try > to focus on tasks you don't feel suited for. I guess that partly depends on > whether you're surrounded by complimentary types, and how much they're > available. > > Jenny Guy > Kingfisher Cohousing, Oakland Calif. > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Sharon Villines < > sharon [at] sharonvillines.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > On Jul 31, 2014, at 7:33 PM, Pat Elliott <pdelliott43 [at] gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > we learned, to the surprise of most of us, that for members of two or > > three households participating in the program is painful, if not > traumatic, > > whether as members of cook teams or eating at common meals. > > > > I can think of many reasons this might be true but I'm wondering > > specifically what their reasons were. > > > > (From reading these messages, I'm becoming more convinced that the work > of > > meals should be considered part of workshare whether people eat or not.) > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation?, (continued)
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Margaret Porter, August 2 2014
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Mariana Almeida, August 5 2014
-
Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Sharon Villines, August 15 2014
-
Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Jenny Guy, August 19 2014
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Diana Carroll, August 21 2014
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Sharon Villines, August 21 2014
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Muriel Kranowski, August 21 2014
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Cat Belfer, August 22 2014
- Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Sharon Villines, August 22 2014
-
Re: Common meals - mandatory participation? Jenny Guy, August 19 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.