Re: Bay Area Cohousing-1 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Heimann (heimann![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:14:07 -0700 (PDT) |
Hello,"Dying Rust-Belt cities"? What dying Rust Belt cities (aside from a few like Detroit, which will probably have rebounded several years from now)? The Rust Belt has definitely rebounded from a generation ago!
Regards, David Subject: [C-L]_ Bay Area Cohousing Message-ID: <FF1EBB4F-9138-4E54-B90A-6AED7C86B6EF [at] stillcreek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:45:56 -0500 Jerry McIntire <jerry.mcintire [at] gmail.com> wrote <snip>Suburban sites or small towns (between crowded urban and distant rural) are an interesting possibility. There will still be transportation issues, but the distances involved are generally shorter than rural patterns. The land parcels are bigger than urban allotments, and it is easier to have gardens, chickens, bees, worksheds (and tiny houses) that are very difficult in cities. Around dying Rust-Belt cities or shrinking Mid West towns, suburbs are hollowing out and there are bargains to be had. Again, primary issues with non-urban choices will be transportation and isolation, both of which are aided by cooperative living and shared resources.
<snip> === Bill William New StillCreek Commons wnew [at] stillcreek.net
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.