Re: Minimum number of units | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jerry McIntire (jerry.mcintire![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:56:14 -0700 (PDT) |
Hello John, >From our planning in a rural area of Wisconsin, and from my experience studying small group communication in university, I'd say twelve is the minimum. When there are fewer, it is too easy to divide into factions and it is more difficult to spread the work to be done sufficiently. Looking at it more positively, you can build a more diverse community that benefits from the unique contributions of a number of different thinkers when you have twelve or more. Because of the small size of our market (the largest town in our county is 5,000 people) we have set our minimum at twelve. We hope to have 15 or 18 homes when we're finished. We have the space on our property which is twelve acres. Jerry -- Jerry McIntire Stone's Throw Ecovillage, in the heart of Wisconsin's beautiful Driftless region http://stonesthrowcommunity.wordpress.com/ 1-608-637-8018 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Goldberg <johngoldberg [at] hotmail.com> wrote: > > I would like to know the number of units of the smallest Cohousing > communities and people's opinions about the smallest number of units > necessary for a viable Cohousing community. Thank you > > John Goldberg > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
-
Minimum number of units John Goldberg, September 11 2014
- Re: Minimum number of units Sharon Villines, September 11 2014
- Re: Minimum number of units Jerry McIntire, September 11 2014
- Minimum number of units Sanna McKim, September 12 2014
- Minimum number of units Rod Lambert, September 12 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.