Re: Community size | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:54:03 -0700 (PDT) |
Trying to manage without resources -- too little labor AND too little capital (equipment and money), no way to substitute one for the other -- is always a challenge. My point is that sometimes cohos create their own challenge by adhering to an unrealistic assessment of total resources required. A different kind of challenge is that of sharing both responsibility and benefit of the commons: the common house, the common truck, the community garden, the common digital projector, for instance. But learning how to share is a major point of living in cohousing; this is not a bug, it's a feature. Philip Dowds > On Sep 14, 2014, at 9:12 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > wrote: > > I love it. Your whole message proves Ann's point. It isn't complex when you > have enough money to hire a manager and then hire all the work done. Money > always makes things simpler. Having someone else make decisions is also > simpler. But then you have to live with them. That's why conventional condos > are so offensively inoffensive in design.
- Re: Community size, (continued)
- Re: Community size Ann Zabaldo, September 13 2014
- Re: Community size R Philip Dowds, September 14 2014
- Re: Community size Ann Zabaldo, September 14 2014
- Re: Community size Sharon Villines, September 14 2014
- Re: Community size R Philip Dowds, September 14 2014
- Re: Community size Sharon Villines, September 15 2014
- Re: Community size Moz, September 14 2014
- Re: community size Sharon Villines, September 14 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.