Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Wilson Fisk (kwilsonfisk![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 14:32:09 -0800 (PST) |
On Dec 24, 2014, at 11:01 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> wrote: > 4. Reaction round of 1-2 word responses to determine if there are any concerns or objections that seem unresolvable or serious. >>> t. Do another round to state concerns and objections in greater detail t: <<< > (a) refer back them back committee or <snip> Thank you, this process looks very helpful. However, I'm confused at what is meant by the "t's" at both the beginning and the end of item "t." above. Please clarify. Kay
-
How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 24 2014
-
Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 24 2014
- Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Kay Wilson Fisk, December 24 2014
- Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 24 2014
-
Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 24 2014
-
Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Jerry McIntire, December 25 2014
- Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 26 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.