Re: participation in decision making | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Emilie Parker (emilie.v.parker![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:26:14 -0800 (PST) |
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:10 AM, John Beutler <jabeutler [at] comcast.net> wrote: Non-profit? Not sure how that supports development of a property. Hi John, I'm following the topic closely about consensus and blocking. Our group is not at that point. Thanks John, for asking the question. I'd like to see what people think. The non-profit will not support the actual homes or common house areas. Since we are all artists in addition to cohousing, we are building a separate shared studio building to set up artist studios, music practice, art-making equipment and to work cooperatively in on art works -- including a gallery. Our sustainability model for the studios is that we will allow cohousing artists and local community artists to be members of the shared studios for a small fee. Even though they may not be living in cohousing they will come in to use the studios and be trusted studio members and have a key and 24/7 access to that building. Local artists membership fees will pay for the overhead and management of our shared studios, with a gallery and art education/performing arts center. The art center is already a successful non-profit partner and a legal relationship with them has not been crafted. For now we're legally 100% separate from the art center but their director is on our new board. Our plan is that the studios will be run as a non-profit and we haven't yet figured out exactly how the governance of that dovetails with our cohousing governance Our flegling board for Synergy Arts just met for the first time this week, so even though the sun is shining, we are knee deep in slush. At the Boulder cohousing conference this year they highlighted a cohousing community that runs a tree farm but I don't have contact info for them. I'd like to collaborate. If I remember correctly several members run it and hire cohousing members to keep funds in the community and cover some expenses. We currently have an LLC that we started a year ago and that's our legal entity for creating our cohousing community for now. We started the non-profit in addition because we wanted to have an option of offering financial participation in the shared art studios to local donors and philanthropists to enable their participation in the development of the studios. Shared art studios will be a community service for local artists and others will want to be part of supporting that. Shared studios is part of our plan to incorporate a new-urbanism model with cohousing. And the property we are going to build on is zoned commercial and has to be rezoned for live/work and commercial so that's a big push right now -- getting that all figured out, timed out, negotiated out and paid and planned for. It's a bunch of puzzle pieces. We have 43 artists and they all want to know if they can afford it and what the homes will look like but we're not there yet. Thanks for asking, Emilie Louisville Artists Cohousing, LLC Synergy Arts Creative Community, Louisville, CO ----------------- Emilie Parker emilie.v.parker [at] gmail.com 303-317-4558 main 240-350-8533 cell
- Re: participation in decision making, (continued)
- Re: participation in decision making Sharon Villines, January 6 2015
- Re: participation in decision making Ann Zabaldo, January 7 2015
- Re: participation in decision making Emilie Parker, January 7 2015
- Re: participation in decision making John Beutler, January 8 2015
- Re: participation in decision making Emilie Parker, January 8 2015
- Re: participation in decision making John Beutler, January 9 2015
- Re: participation in decision making Sharon Villines, January 8 2015
- Re: Possible Cohousing/Permaculture based farm project near Ann Arbor, MI Vasi Toneva, January 8 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.