Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Alice Alexander (alicecohous![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 05:01:13 -0800 (PST) |
Many thanks to these good comments from folks. To Phil's suggestion: *I think CohoUS could do us a service by collecting and compiling real financial information from established communities*. That is a great idea, although complicated - $300 a month in a rural area does not equate to $300 in metro; not to mention how do we count apples to apples, given every community has unique inclusions, with some including reserve fund with monthly assessment for example, others not. Would a volunteer be willing to take this on, to collect this info? and how to create a baseline for comparison? Alice On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:42 AM, R Philip Dowds <rpdowds [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > First off: What’s “high”? What’s “low”? This kind of qualitative debate > suffers enormously from lack of quantitative input. Some at Cornerstone > think our annual assessments are “high” — but we have at least one member > who moved here after living in a variety of conventional condo situations, > and thinks our assessments are quite “low”. For instance, we self-manage > and self-account, which saves us at least $12K a year, probably more. > > But on average, cohousers should expect their common expenses to be > “high”. This is why they moved to cohousing: Not for the biggest, bestest > private units they could afford, but for a collaborative lifestyle > inclusive of certain kinds of sharing. The spaces in common, the > activities in common, cost money to build and sustain — unlike, for > instance, you grandfather’s condo, which had little in common other than > the stairs. > > Does this impede marketability and sales? Absolutely, positively it > does. Most Americans do not want any part of the intentional community > lifestyle. So right off the bat, any coho, by aim and choice, has directed > its real estate asset to a narrow market segment. If many buyers walk away > from a coho purchase, it’s not because the HOA assessments are “too high”, > but rather because these assessments pay for a product that is not wanted. > Except by a minority of buyers. > > I think CohoUS could do us a service by collecting and compiling real > financial information from established communities. > > RPD > > > On Feb 15, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > To be clear almost no cohousing community has two separate fees like > ours. We were mandated by the state (or town? details aren't my strength) > to make it so the affordable buyers didn't have to "join" anything if they > didn't want to. > > > > AND we are two coho's on the same land, each with different solutions to > that requirement. > > Camelot Cohousing rolled everything into HOA dues and said, there, there > is no reason to "join" anything. > > Mosaic made two separate fees, with the smaller coho amount on a sliding > scale, in an effort to have a sliding scale component to our fees. (We had > planned to have our HOA dues sliding scale, before we understood that that > was legally impossible or impractical or both.) > > > > On the "truly voluntary" yes, you can really choose not to pay them. We > were required to make it so they can use the Common house (they own part of > it, of course). But the reality of our situation is we are not near public > transportation, by the time we were selling our "affordable homes" cost the > same as a depressed market city townhome, and we are far from Boston...so > the only people who wanted affordable homes here were people who were > looking for cohousing. So its really voluntary in that people choose where > they are on the sliding scale, but no one chooses not to join. (Actually so > far I believe the only people who didn't join were market rate buyers who > never moved in.) > > > > I think the valuable question is "what did urban locations who have low > HOA fees do to make them low"? Because our high HOA fees certainly hurt our > sales. (We have the highest fees around and there were several non-buyers > who mentioned the HOA cost as prohibitive.) > > > > -Liz > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > > -- Alice Alexander Executive Director www.cohousing.org <http://www.cohous.org> [image: The Cohousing Association]
-
Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Robert Tabak, February 14 2015
-
Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Elizabeth Magill, February 15 2015
-
Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn R Philip Dowds, February 15 2015
- Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Alice Alexander, February 16 2015
- Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn R Philip Dowds, February 17 2015
- Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Sharon Villines, February 16 2015
- Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Catya Belfer, February 17 2015
- Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Sharon Villines, February 17 2015
-
Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn R Philip Dowds, February 15 2015
-
Re: Two monthly fees: Homeowners (HOA) and CoHo Assn Elizabeth Magill, February 15 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.