Re: management services vs self-management at the building stage | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 03:27:15 -0700 (PDT) |
First off … forming cohousing groups do not NEED a developer. These groups ARE the developer. That is, they are the ones risking time, money and emotional tranquility, trying to find a suitable property and turn it into something else. The issue here is that such groups are not experienced or professional developers. Mostly, they are amateur developers, doing their first, last and only project. They need help. A lot of help. So who guides novitiates through the treacherous terrain of property development? A couple of generations ago, one common answer to this question was … the architect. But as the regulatory and technology context became ever more complex, and the divisions of labor ever more acute, the architect came to be seen, less as an impartial guide, and more as a self-interested party, just one contestant among many. But it’s worth remembering that many cohousing projects include one or more architects in their founding membership. Sometimes they work for free, sometimes they are paid by their co-members. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn’t. In any event, in recent times, many amateur developers will hire a specialist consultant to help them oversee and manage their adventure. In fact, a whole recognized profession is growing up around this role: The OPR or OPM — Owner’s Project Representative, or Owner’s Project Manager. This hired consultant is intended to take the lead in orchestrating all parts of the development process, like: working through realtors to identify suitable land; finding the architect, engineers and general contractor; writing and/or reviewing all the contracts; laying out and directing the master schedule; shepherding the permitting; monitoring the construction process; review invoices and approving payments, and so on. These OPR tasks and skills are common to all development projects. Certainly, experience with cohousing is a valuable plus, but it’s not absolutely necessary. On the whole, everybody’s basic skill sets — designing something that meets program and budget, erecting a steel frame, bargaining with the building inspector — are largely transferrable from housing to shopping malls to churches. If you can find parties who’ve done cohousing before, great. But if not, then go ahead with parties generally conversant with the basics of your project: housing; wood frame construction; special permit from your local planning board, etc. If you cannot find an OPR/OPM you like and trust — and want to pay, as an added project cost — then I recommend you return to old school, and make sure you have an architect you can trust to help you run your project. R Philip Dowds 175 Harvey Street, Unit 5 Cambridge, MA 02140 land: 617.354.6094 mobile: 617.460.4549 email: rpdowds [at] comcast.net > On May 5, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > wrote: > > > >> On May 5, 2015, at 9:24 PM, Allison tom <allison.tom [at] telus.net> wrote: >> >> >> No, I mean a management company who oversees the process of land >> acquisition, building, community formation. > > I don’t think you will find anyone who does all those things. There are > people like Chris Scott Hanson who manage the upfront part of land > acquisition but he doesn’t do building or community formation. Chris has a > good bit of information about the process on his site: > > http://www.urbancohousingassociates.com > > Other people do design and may oversee construction. Other people (you) do > community formation. > > What have you read on cohousing? The Cohousing Handbook? Housing Ourselves? > Diana Leafe Christian’s books? > > Sharon > ---- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Consultation & Facilities Management [was management services vs self-management at the building stage, (continued)
- Consultation & Facilities Management [was management services vs self-management at the building stage Sharon Villines, May 6 2015
- Re: Consultation & Facilities Management [was management services vs self-management at the building stage Jerry McIntire, May 7 2015
- Re: Consultation & Facilities Management [was management services vs self-management at the building stage rsmith2, May 8 2015
- Re: management services vs self-management at the building stage R Philip Dowds, May 6 2015
- Re: management services vs self-management at the building stage Elizabeth Magill, May 7 2015
- Re: management services vs self-management at the building stage R Philip Dowds, May 7 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.