Re: meeting minutes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:27:51 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Sep 10, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Diana Carroll <dianaecarroll [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > That doesn't really seem relevant to me. The goal of college note taking is > to enhance the understanding of the note taker herself. The goal of minute > taking is for the benefit of others. What enhances one's own learning > process is different than what helps others who couldn't be there > understand what they missed. But how good are the minutes if they don’t communicate the whole context of the room? The meaning of the words. Just a transcript doesn’t do that. The secretary is not just a recorder, like a court reporter. The secretary is an administrative position and their role in the organization is to remember and apply decisions and related discussions, not just record them. The secretary steers the flow and storage of information. I’m sure Muriel and Mariah do summarize and be sure the information is fully communicated, but many laptop people don’t. It’s just a verbatim transcript which lacks the emphasis, rhythm, non-verbal communication, laughter, etc. They often appear to be not even listening — they just type. And this person will not be able to remember or communicate the meaning of the meeting. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: meeting minutes, (continued)
- Re: meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 9 2015
- Re: meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 9 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 10 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Diana Carroll, September 10 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 10 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 10 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Diana Carroll, September 10 2015
- Re: meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 10 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.