Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ann Zabaldo (zabaldo![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:32:33 -0700 (PDT) |
Well Phillip … in some ways you are making my point. Condominiums are ubiquitous because they are profitable in the housing industry. If they weren’t they wouldn’t be built. Of course, cohousing has a major social component. But as the name implies it is also HOUSING and as such we are subject to all the issues facing housing anywhere. AND because cohousing has been a mostly grass roots movement we have trod a different path of early on inclusion of residents in the planning and execution of the project. I could make the case that this different path has inhibited the growth of cohousing. And I can make an even stronger case that while inhibiting fast growth we have created a more robust and resilient end user community. So cohousing is this lovely hybrid model out here in the housing industry. Housing with a conscious. What to do with it? How to make it grow? There are other housing movements that have advocates via organizations: affordable housing, co-ops, land trusts, etc. The difference there is that most of these have an ongoing income stream generally from municipalities (co-ops may be an exception as they are more like condos in the marketplace but they do have an advocacy organization or two!) So I still say until more developers and others can earn a living from cohousing we will remain in this slow, very slow growth phase. Who does it benefit for us to remain in this state? Best -- Ann Zabaldo Takoma Village Cohousing Washington, DC Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC Falls Church, VA 202.546.4654 My password is the last 5 digits of Pi … > On Jun 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM, R Philip Dowds <rpdowds [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > > Maybe there is an informative analogy between cohousing and the general > typology of which it is a subset: condominium associations (or HOAs, as they > are known in some states). > > For sure, there are many professionals and disciplines that seek to earn, and > do earn, a living from condominiums: Real estate developers, architects > specializing in multi-family design, property managers, attorneys, > accountants and reserve planning specialists, and so on. Some of these > professionals are focused uniquely on condos, others are active more broadly > in the residential or real estate market. In any event, there is money to be > made, and there are professional associations with budgets, staff and annual > conventions supporting the various disciplines. > > But … is there a national condominium movement? That is, an organized body > of advocates and practitioners who believe that condominiums are the right > way to live, and that (most) everyone should be living in condominiums? Is > there a national condominium association promoting condo life, and trying to > draw people in, proselytizing the concept like a church or conservation > group? If there is, it is unknown to me. > > So: I don’t think there is any such thing as a national condominium movement. > Nor do I think there is much money to attract by promoting condos as a great > idea generally. I think there are some reasons why this might be true — and > I think some of these reasons are applicable to cohousing. For those of us > who do believe that cohousing is a great idea … are we the vanguard of a > movement? Or, are we trying to share a gift? How we answer this question > will influence how we conceptualize our financial model. > > Thanks, > Philip Dowds > Cornerstone Village Cohousing > Cambridge, MA > >> On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:46 PM, Ann Zabaldo <zabaldo [at] earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Tiffany Lee Brown <magdalen23 [at] gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Why not make it so the same platform/with a differently branded app could >>> be used for developers to start for-profit housing arrangements? >> >> Why would a developer or a group of developers do this unless they knew they >> could make a profit? What we lack is research and reliable industry figures >> that current professionals are willing to share so as to draw other >> professionals into the biz. >>> >>> The rationale in this case is to get venture capitalists and/or developers >>> to put up the money to develop tools the rest of us need! I've spent most >>> of my life in nonprofit, community projects. It does not behoove us to >>> underpay our visionaries and workers, or to expect everything to be done on >>> a volunteer basis -- this is still how I do many things, but I think it >>> lends itself to burnout and limits community leadership and engagement to >>> people who can afford to work for free. Not everyone has that luxury. >> >> I agree that we overwork our volunteers to death. If cohousing is to grow, >> it needs to provide people with an income so they can work in a field they >> love full time and not “hobby” time. >> >> However, I still don’t see developers putting up the money to develop tools >> “the rest of use will use.” First of all … who are “the rest of us?” The >> volunteer folks? The folks that will work to create one cohousinig >> community they will live in but not another one? How does that further the >> movement beyond what is happening right now? If cohousing is to really, >> seriously take off … it needs a professional group of people who earn a >> living at this. Development is too big to do part time or with just >> volunteers. (And God Bless all the zillions of volunteers and volunteer >> hours by paid professionals who have gotten us this far in the movement. >> You are Awesome!) >>> >>> Tiffany >>> >>> Sent from the far shores of a distant land >> >> Best -- >> >> Ann Zabaldo >> Takoma Village Cohousing >> Washington, DC >> Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC >> Falls Church, VA >> 202.546.4654 >> >> My password is the last 5 digits of Pi … >>> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: Community Associations Institute [was Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net, (continued)
- Re: Community Associations Institute [was Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Sharon Villines, June 17 2016
- Re: Community Associations Institute [was Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Richard L Kohlhaas, June 17 2016
- Re: Community Associations Institute [was Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Kathryn McCamant, June 17 2016
- Re: Community Associations Institute [was Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net R Philip Dowds, June 18 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Ann Zabaldo, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Tiffany Lee Brown, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Tiffany Lee Brown, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Ann Zabaldo, June 18 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Tiffany Lee Brown, June 18 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.