Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mary Baker, Solid Communications (mary![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT) |
Ann, respectfully, I think if your firm worked for two years on a solution and failed to launch you: * probably over-engineered your solution A typical situation that occurs when people over-think a project and try to address every imaginable problem, instead of building things in a modular fashion. Or perhaps you were trying to use a technology platform unsuited to the purpose, instead of building from scratch? You are also making an: * assumption that creators are seeking or need income Some designers do it simply for the challenge and experience, and of course a successful application always looks stellar in a career portfolio. An application engineer doesn’t always need a highly trafficked app, if he/she can point to a fully workable app with satisfied users. I am currently working with Dick Yates of GleanWeb.org to build a county-wide gleaning site—the site is free, along with one year of free mentoring and hosting. And it’s a very complex site with a lot of data gathering. I have yet to find out if the software is directly supported by grants, but I know it didn’t start out that way—it was simply created to fill a need. And there is your: * assumption that apps cannot succeed in a niche audience Current advice to app creators is to focus, focus, focus on very small niche markets and build apps specifically for their needs. The more specific the solution, the more likely they will succeed. GleanWeb started out with just one client. And then there is the: * assumption that there is little or no interest For an in-house solution to work, a community needs buy-in from a majority of members, but an outside solution can appeal to just a few members from each community and still be a success. My little site is steadily growing, with visitors this week from Canada, Spain, Germany and the UK. (You can view visitor stats in the traffic box in the right sidebar.) I’m feeling very positive about the networking potential for cohousing. In just this last year, there have been more and more cohousing sites and organizations on Facebook, and within the last year there’s been the advent of my forum, and now Carles’ launch, and Corey’s project, which I’m excited to learn more about. In fact, Carles has joined my forum, and I’m off now to give him some creative feedback. Cheers, Mary PS. Corey, are you familiar with this site? http://cohousing-portals.1011783.n3.nabble.com/Mosaic-a-Cohousing-Portal-Web-Application-td17.html
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net, (continued)
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Corey, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Sharon Villines, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net R Philip Dowds, June 18 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Ann Zabaldo, June 18 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Mary Baker, Solid Communications, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Sharon Villines, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Mary Baker, Solid Communications, June 17 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Tiffany Lee Brown, June 16 2016
- Re: Launching June 15: CohousingMap.net Ann Zabaldo, June 16 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.