Re: Internet Service [was Wireless dislike] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mary English (mary.english![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:38:06 -0700 (PDT) |
We tried several companies at Wasatch Commons for internet for the entire community, but got a flat no from each company. Mary English ________________________________________ Common house Internet provider has said that that kind of redistribution is not allowed. > Aha, a sticky point. It may vary by provider, but... > Our provider's agreement says the service cannot be resold. That is if I have > the service and let my neighbours access it for a fee that would not be > allowed. So how do we deal with that? We don’t resell it. We pay it out of the common budget as a lump sum. And we told them we were doing this and how it needed to be set up. There was no problem. We could do the same thing with cable TV but not enough people here watch TV or want cable. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Internet Service [was Wireless dislike, (continued)
- Internet Service [was Wireless dislike Sharon Villines, July 24 2016
- Re: Internet Service [was Wireless dislike] John Carver, July 24 2016
- Re: Internet Service [was Wireless dislike] Jenny Guy, July 24 2016
- Re: Internet Service [was Wireless dislike] Sharon Villines, July 24 2016
- Re: Internet Service [was Wireless dislike] Mary English, July 25 2016
- Re: Wireless dislike Tom Smyth, July 23 2016
- Re: Wireless dislike Jenny Guy, July 24 2016
- Re: Wireless dislike Sharon Villines, July 24 2016
- Re: Wireless dislike Mary Baker, Solid Communications, July 25 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.