Re: Use of science/facts in decision making was violent video games in CH | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Magill (pastorlizm![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 10:05:39 -0800 (PST) |
On the solar, were there any folk anxious about the … i guess its a converter of some sort? … in the basement producing radiation? And if so did providing the known facts solve that challenge? -Liz (The Rev.) Elizabeth M. Magill www.ecclesiaministriesmission.org www.mosaic-commons.org 508-450-0431 > On Dec 31, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] > sharonvillines.com> wrote: > > In a recent decision on solar panels, a working group did all the research > about feasibility and best options. We have several people who work at the > Department of Energy and two engineers so we fully trusted their > recommendation. And we’ve wanted solar panels for years but research showed > that they were not a good purchase before. The community decision was do we > want to spend this much money? All the other questions had been answered.
- Funny tangent on Re: violent video games in CH, (continued)
- Funny tangent on Re: violent video games in CH Elizabeth Magill, November 30 2016
- Re: violent video games in CH Joanie Connors, November 30 2016
- Use of science/facts in decision making was violent video games in CH Elizabeth Magill, December 30 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making was violent video games in CH Sharon Villines, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making was violent video games in CH Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making was violent video games in CH Sharon Villines, December 31 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.