Re: Common house designation for legal purposes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:59:31 -0800 (PST) |
There are issues only if you are charging admission. Contributions don’t count. Any injuries should be covered by your insurance—they are you guests. And with a building permit for occupancy the building has been designated as safe for a certain number of people. At least that is the way it is in DC. Sharon. > On Feb 7, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Maggi <librarymaggi [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks, this is all very useful. My concern at the moment is showing > movies. If we watch movies together on our television, there's an argument > that it's private space... but what if we are watching with sixty people > and half of them don't live there? What if it's a streaming service which > prohibits public showings? What if people are taking donations? > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] > sharonvillines.com> > wrote: > >> >> >>> On Feb 6, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> >> wrote: >>> The fire rules for the CH are the same as other public spaces in terms >> of exit signs required, maximum capacity signs posted, etc. >> >> And ADA requirements. And parking spaces have to have standard size >> spaces, clearances, signage, etc. The Association is responsible for all >> structural and exterior work and is liable for worker injuries. We have the >> same insurance as the 2.000 unit place down the street. >> >> Lot development models are probably very different. >> >> Sharon >> ---- >> Sharon Villines >> Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC >> http://www.takomavillage.org >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >> >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: Common house designation for legal purposes, (continued)
- Re: Common house designation for legal purposes KAREN A CARLSON, February 5 2017
-
Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Sharon Villines, February 6 2017
-
Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Sharon Villines, February 6 2017
- Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Maggi, February 7 2017
- Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Sharon Villines, February 9 2017
-
Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Sharon Villines, February 6 2017
-
Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Maggi, February 8 2017
- Re: Common house designation for legal purposes Dick Margulis, February 8 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.