Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Emilie Parker <emilie.v.parker [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > > A lot of these stories seem to highlight unfair and naive negative > generalizations upon which to discriminate against art cohousers. I knew that would be the case — that people would think I was making negative generalizations, but “negative” is a judgement. Reality can be reality or it can feel negative. To have a passion that is greater than yard work, stoking the furnace, or cooking meals would not be negative to an artist. I’m basing this on my experience. I am an artist and have worked with artists for 60 years. 25 years teaching at the college level, much of it in Soho and Greenwich Village. Plus I was exhibiting, judging shows, running workshops for artists, etc. Often commuting 3-4 hours a day. The negativity comes from putting the realities of the artist's life together with the realities of cohousing. Two hard roads that are good roads don’t make one easy road. Obviously I’m making generalizations, but generalizations are what is in play when you are casting your net to the general population. You need to know what the general population is likely to produce. When you are building a cohousing community it is pretty easy at times to feel negative about the people who won’t join you and about why they won’t join. Artists are a small fraction of the general population. The percentage of any population who will be interested in cohousing is a fraction. So we are now down to fractions of fractions. Then look at the lifestyle of artists — low income, working two jobs. With children. These are not the people who can even afford cohousing. And they are more interested in their work than anything else. Of course, this depends on your definition of artist. I’m thinking about artists who are working toward be full-time professional exhibiting, usually teaching, and selling their work. The generalization of artists being free-spirited, forward thinking socially radical, peace-loving, and naturally collaborative people is as true of artists as it is of everyone else. And of cohousers. That’s why we have to think twice about how wonderful it would be to have a cohousing community of artists. It would take as much support as affordable or low-income cohousing for people who work two jobs, have children, and a primary interest that for visual artists is by its nature not social. Dance and music require many hours a day of practice, just to keep the physical skills honed. Those hours are put in after paying work. The traditional forms of cohousing, with self-management, home ownership, and workshare don’t work for everyone. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN, (continued)
- Re: Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Ann Zabaldo, March 11 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Raines Cohen, March 12 2017
- Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Sharon Villines, March 12 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Emilie Parker, March 12 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Sharon Villines, March 15 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Vicki Rittner, March 15 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Emilie Parker, March 15 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Dick Margulis, March 16 2017
- Re: Cohousing for Artists [was Cohousing for Senior Artists - Request from CNN Sharon Villines, March 16 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.