Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 21:14:35 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Michelle Keiserman <msmakman1 [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > We are a group of five enthusiastic households who want to bring cohousing > to Nevada. Four of us are investing both the time and money ($2500 each so > far) for initial marketing to attract more members. The first concern is spending money on marketing. I think few cohousing communities will say that marketing in the traditional sense placing ads or hiring consultants was profitable. One group, for example, bought an ad in the Utne Reader because a marketing consultant said that magazine’s profile matched the characteristics of cohousers. They got hundreds of responses and not one taker. It was a waste of time to just respond. Personal contact, flyers in health food stores, chiropractor’s offices, Unitarian Churches, Reform Synagogues, etc. have been much more productive. An ad on CohoUSA is different because that is your target market. > One individual has > invested that amount but does not have the time to dig in and help us get > the work done. While we recognize the value each of us brings to this > effort, we are wondering if other communities have accounted in some way > for the time/effort invested in the early days. We are familiar with the > benefits of making an early financial commitment, but what if you've made > both and some other members cannot? I think most communities don’t and they should. Start out with levels of promise to households who are engaged and those who are not engaged. “Engaged” needn’t be measured, but if a household says from the beginning we have money but no time, clearly they are in a different level of commitment than those who are contributing both financially and working as well. Make room for everyone but balance the levels of privilege given to each. Begin accounting from the beginning. If the first households are investing $2,500, later joiners should contribute equal amounts or the first contributors receive greater discounts on their homes. One way or another, things need to feel balanced when you move in. And people who join later should recognize the importance of the contributions of the first members. Build a priority list of first to choose a house/unit based on commitments. This encourages people to join early on rather than sitting aside and watching. And: Everyone has 24 hours in a day. No one has more than anyone else. The issue is how each person prioritizes their time. There are temporary periods of overload with a new baby or caring for an aging parent, but people have to make room for building community now just as you will need them to build community after you move in. It won’t appear full blown when the last box is unpacked. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Michelle Keiserman, June 12 2017
-
Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days R Philip Dowds, June 12 2017
- Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Mabel Liang, June 12 2017
- Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Elizabeth Magill, June 12 2017
- Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Sharon Villines, June 12 2017
-
Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Kathryn McCamant, June 13 2017
- Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Sharon Villines, June 14 2017
- Do Marketing Models Fit the Market? ... was recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Ann Zabaldo, June 15 2017
- Re: Do Marketing Models Fit the Market? ... was recognizing time versus financial investment in early days Sharon Villines, June 16 2017
-
Re: recognizing time versus financial investment in early days R Philip Dowds, June 12 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.