Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Gerald Manata (gmanata2003![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:57:49 -0700 (PDT) |
The worst case of diversity problems that I have witnessed in cohousing is along the lines of cultural and subcultural differences. Added to that is good old American individualism and you have situations that can get quite ugly and vicious. Consensus democracy is extremely difficult under such circumstances.The U.S. is not Denmark. You can't just borrow a system from one culture and add it to another without expecting difficulties.Perhaps this explains the large turnover in cohousing and the lack of interest in cohousing among its offspring. In a effort to recruit members and sell units, organizers are neglecting some kind of necessary, serious and lengthy vetting process. Conservative, bourgeois American types should live in one cohousing complex, for example, more countercultural, communitarian types should live in another, etc. You can't get along with your neighbors and practice consensus democracy if you aren't all on the same page. -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/14/17, Tom Smyth <tom [at] tomsmyth.ca> wrote: Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Date: Monday, August 14, 2017, 7:22 PM It isn’t an argument about whether it is a thing, but it isn’t the only thing. Diversity doesn’t equal skin color. And skin color doesn’t equal diversity. I agree. And racial diversity need not be the only kind we seek. Age diversity is also a great thing, for example. I guess my contention is that diversity along any axis of oppression is important because living amongst people from traditionally oppressed groups (or perhaps more importantly *getting ourselves to the place where they might want to live amongst us*) makes us, as privileged people, less likely to oppress them. On the other hand, I'm less interested in diversity along axes that don't equate with oppressions, like favorite color, zodiac sign, conservative vs. liberal, etc. So it is not magic that I'm talking about. It's oppression. Certainly you get lots of cultural bonuses if you achieve racial, age, income, etc. diversity, but those are not the main driver for me. I hope that helps clarify my position and, I think, that of a lot of people who value diversity. _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab, (continued)
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Tom Smyth, August 14 2017
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Sharon Villines, August 14 2017
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Tom Smyth, August 14 2017
- Social Change [was Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Sharon Villines, August 16 2017
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Raines Cohen, August 21 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.