| Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Gerald Manata (gmanata2003 |
|
| Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:57:49 -0700 (PDT) | |
The worst case of diversity problems that I have witnessed in cohousing is
along the lines of cultural and subcultural differences. Added to that is good
old American individualism and you have situations that can get quite ugly and
vicious. Consensus democracy is extremely difficult under such
circumstances.The U.S. is not Denmark. You can't just borrow a system from one
culture and add it to another without expecting difficulties.Perhaps this
explains the large turnover in cohousing and the lack of interest in cohousing
among its offspring.
In a effort to recruit members and sell units, organizers are neglecting
some kind of necessary, serious and lengthy vetting process. Conservative,
bourgeois American types should live in one cohousing complex, for example,
more countercultural, communitarian types should live in another, etc. You
can't get along with your neighbors and practice consensus democracy if you
aren't all on the same page. --------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/14/17, Tom Smyth <tom [at] tomsmyth.ca> wrote:
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab
To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org
Date: Monday, August 14, 2017, 7:22 PM
It isn’t an argument about
whether it is a thing, but it isn’t the only
thing. Diversity doesn’t equal skin color.
And skin color doesn’t equal
diversity.
I agree. And
racial diversity need not be the only kind we seek. Age
diversity is also a great thing, for
example.
I guess my
contention is that diversity along any axis of oppression
is
important because living amongst people
from traditionally oppressed groups
(or
perhaps more importantly *getting ourselves to the place
where they
might want to live amongst us*)
makes us, as privileged people, less likely
to oppress them.
On the other hand, I'm less interested in
diversity along axes that don't
equate
with oppressions, like favorite color, zodiac sign,
conservative vs.
liberal, etc.
So it is not magic that
I'm talking about. It's oppression. Certainly you
get lots of cultural bonuses if you achieve
racial, age, income, etc.
diversity, but
those are not the main driver for me. I hope that helps
clarify my position and, I think, that of a lot
of people who value
diversity.
_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe,
archives and other info at:
http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab, (continued)
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Tom Smyth, August 14 2017
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Sharon Villines, August 14 2017
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Tom Smyth, August 14 2017
- Social Change [was Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Sharon Villines, August 16 2017
- Re: Cohousing's Diversity Problem - CityLab Raines Cohen, August 21 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.