Re: Accessibility of Community Records | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Chris Hansen (itschrishansen![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:13:47 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks for this Sharon! I am a recently-appointed secretary to our Board of Directors, and have been wondering about how other CoHousing communities keep their electronic archives, records etc I currently have a good personal and work-related relationship with Google Drive, which I am paying for larger storage space. Wondering about what others' thoughts and experiences with this are? Also- as someone who managed a number of listservs and also lost years of valued archives when yahoogroups made the unannounced decision to strip it's attachments; I can't begin to imagine how frustrating losing all of that history must have been! I'm also wondering- do you back up regularly? How often? To a hard drive? Other cloud-based venues? Other? Cheers Chris On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 at 08:59 Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> wrote: > I started this message in response to the Gather program. I pulled it out > because it became so long the response to Gather was buried. > > Some people like living in the present and are perfectly happy repeating > history because they don’t know it’s a repeat. They just go along. > > Others like to glean information and confirm information. We like records. > And find them incredibly revealing and useful. So the choice of a good > system for maintaining searchable information is important. Without > completeness, it is reliable. And without searchability, it’s like a > library with no catalog or cross indexing. > > I’ll repeat a story I’ve told before because it is pivotal in my thinking > about all the “free" services out there. Since the beginning in 1998, we > used YahooGroups as our storage for minutes and everything else. A number > of years ago, Yahoo decided to strip all attachments from stored emails. > Overnight we lost years and years of history. Anything not pasted into a > message was gone. Years and years —— including all the early drafts and > final copies of mission statements, team planning documents, photos, why > this was built this way and not that, etc. It was gone with no warning or > ability to transfer the information elsewhere. > > And what may be a new story, we set up a very, very successful wiki on > Google Sites for the Facilities Team. People with no technical tolerance at > all were suddenly able and willing to keep records of all the repairs and > information related to systems. We now have access to a well ordered and > searchable archive of information on everything facilities -- IP addresses, > the location of the stored replacement feet for the dining room chairs, the > model numbers for the HVAC units, the colors for the paint on the walls > (you can’t imagine how many people ask for these), who did the electrical > work on the old water heater, etc. All the facilities-related information > in one place and searchable. > > But then one day, I noticed that we were at 99% of our memory limit. There > is nothing in the documentation, or at least there wasn’t, about a storage > limit. And Google has no provision for being able to pay for more memory. > Now that we had this wonderful resource, we couldn’t even pay to keep it. > Efforts to download our information and move it need more technical > expertise than any of us have. And we have no place to move it anyway. > GoogleSites was perfect. Now that it has proved itself, it's no longer > available. > > That’s why I don’t trust “free" things. I've recommended Groups.io because > it has a long term business plan — for a certain level of service it is > free but if you need more it is there, for a very reasonable price. The > support network of users and the presence of expert users is large and > accessible. Yahoo’s no longer is. You are on your own. > > That’s why good information architecture is important. We no longer have > clerks or “little ladies at home” keeping records and remembering where > every piece of information is. Things have changed, but the needs haven’t. > > We are currently using Association Voice which is far from perfect but it > is reliable and very unlikely to go away. It serves a purpose for many, > many communities. And provides a living for many people as well. Money is > not all bad. > > Sharon > ---- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > > -- Chris Hansen 32 East Village Drive Burlington Vermont 05401 USA +1 802 5408153
-
Accessibility of Community Records Sharon Villines, September 4 2017
- CORRECTION: Accessibility of Community Records Sharon Villines, September 4 2017
- Re: Accessibility of Community Records Chris Hansen, September 4 2017
-
Re: Accessibility of Community Records Tom Smyth, September 10 2017
- Re: Accessibility of Community Records Sharon Villines, September 10 2017
- Re: Accessibility of Community Records Tom Smyth, September 10 2017
- Re: Accessibility of Community Records Alicia George, September 11 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.