Re: follow on question to "interested people" discussion | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Magill (pastorlizm![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:26:56 -0700 (PDT) |
In my experience, as someone who could barely afford this project until I inherited a hunk of money, a big challenge of a "self-developed" project is that you need a LOT of money. Which means you need mostly people who can afford to put in a lot of money at the start. Our deal was roughly that you could be an associate for a long time at 50 or $75 per month--but the longer you waited you were missing the sign-up priority for which house you wanted.... Once you joined you put in the 5% of the estimated cost of the house...a few of us had payment plans but mostly the group needed that cash. Then the cost of the houses went up and folk put in extra to get to the 5%--again some folk couldn't pay additional that right away, but *mostly* folk were in the group that could afford to do that. In the end all but two (i think) of the original folk put in 20% of the cost of their home into the project. Several folk put in more than that. And all of that money was at risk. In addition to needing people who have free cash in order to self-develop, I think we'd have been wiser to ask folk to actually fill out loan applications and qualify for mortgages much earlier. Unexpectedly, lots of people don't know what they can afford and so were planning to buy a house for which they were not going to qualify...... Liz Mosaic commons in Berlin MA. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Michelle Keiserman <msmakman1 [at] gmail.com> wrote: > We at Southern Nevada Cohousing are struggling with this issue many of you > are addressing in the other discussion thread. But along with this issue > of involvement by interested but not yet paid members, we would appreciate > communities sharing information on their initial "buy-in" cost for > associate/explorer membership, which benefits this does and does not > confer, the "cost" of full membership (% of unit cost or flat rate) and its > timing. Our current $500/2500 rates are driven by the estimated cost of > moving to the next stage of a concept drawing to take to the target > property owner and to cover marketing costs. Unfortunately, after two > years of working the "free" avenues of marketing, we have learned that we > must spend real money getting the word out and educating Las Vegans on > cohousing. But we worry that our current fee structure is too big a hurdle > for some who want involvement and may eventually buy-in as we move closer > to actualization of the project. > Thank you! > Michelle Keiserman > SNV Cohousing LLC > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > -- -Liz (The Rev.) Elizabeth M. Magill Minister to the Affiliates, Ecclesia Ministries www.ecclesiaministriesmission.org www.mosaic-commons.org 508-450-0431
-
follow on question to "interested people" discussion Michelle Keiserman, October 3 2017
- Re: follow on question to "interested people" discussion Elizabeth Magill, October 3 2017
-
Re: follow on question to "interested people" discussion Sharon Villines, October 3 2017
- Re: follow on question to "interested people" discussion Sharon Villines, October 3 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.