Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Diana Carroll (dianaecarroll![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:40:23 -0700 (PDT) |
I'll share my limited knowledge of the legal situation below, but first I wanted to ask WHY this issue is important to you. I'm guessing it's because you are fearful that someone will move into your community who isn't into the whole "community" thing and just wants the house. You worry that that person/people will not follow consensed-upon guidelines, and won't be a good, community-minded person, perhaps even disrupting the community. We (Mosaic Commons) worried about that a lot! It turns out our worries were unfounded. Mostly, people who move into cohousing do so because they *want to live in cohousing*. Our houses are smaller than other houses they could get for the money. You have to park your car a long way from your unit. The of the neighborhood is decidedly....community-feeling, which many find unnerving and invasive. People who aren't into that just *don't move here. * We do have some people who seem more or less committed than others to participating actively/a productive way in the community, but that's going to happen regardless of what people sign when they purchase. Every cohousing community reports the same thing. Even people who THINK they want community don't always like the realities of it when they move on. Friendly neighbors and low crime? Yes! Going to meetings and making rules by consensus? Not so much. Okay, that said, here's what I know about your actual question.... All HOAs and condos require home owners to follow rules. Those documents are provided to the buyers before purchase. I don’t know if the buyers are required to literally *sign* those documents, I imagine that depends on state law. (I believe in MA you need to sign that they were provided to you, not positive on that.) Ask your realtor how that works in your state. I'm guessing you are legally limited to only requiring what is in your official condo/HOA documents. Your email didn't state anything about how far along you are in the process...planning, building, moved-in... (helpful to include that info!)...but if your condo entity is not yet registered, you can make those the documents say what you need said. When we at Mosaic Commons created our condo docs (10 years ago), we thought very carefully about what to include. We had already decided on several "rules" for our community, ranging from our consensus process to a dog leash rule to how many consecutive nights members could reserve the guest rooms. We codified a few of those rules as part of the condo docs. These are the rules that we can *legally enforce*. Here in MA you absolutely *cannot* legally enforce rules that discriminate on the basis of the state's protected classes, which include race, gender, sexuality, religion, handicap, etc. To be safe, nothing can even be interpreted as discriminatory, even if you didn't intend it that way. Your lawyer needs to carefully review the language in your condo docs to make sure it's legal. Mosaic Commons also has a large set of rule, guidelines, and best practices that are not codified in our condo docs, and thus not legally enforceable. These include things like participation in work weekends, reservations of guest rooms, etc. Basically, the stuff that distinguishes cohousing from a regular condo association. We certainly try hard to make sure that new buyers see our cohousing documents in addition to the official condo docs, but there's no requirement that the association have contact with the buyer before purchase, so that doesn't necessarily happen. (One of our "cohousing" rules is that when a home is resold, the seller provide this info to the buyer...but that too is a cohousing rule and is therefore not legally enforceable.) Here are the legal condo docs for our community: http://mosaic-commons.org/condodocs (They are in two parts because we have a "super-association" with two sub-associations because reasons.) What you want to look at is the Mosaic Commons Declaration of Trust and the Master Deed. Diana Mosaic Commons, Berlin, MA On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:00 AM Alicia Nowicki <alicianowicki [at] gmail.com> wrote: > I totally understand what the realtor is saying and yet I think it is > important for someone who is moving into your community to understand what > is expected of them. I understand we have no legal right to exclude > someone but I do believe we have a right to be sure they are informed > before they move in. Perhaps that viewpoint can be shared with the realtor. > Alicia > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 12, 2018, at 1:51 PM, Barbara Opyt <barbopyt [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We were thinking of having prospective buyers sign a statement something > > like "I have read the member handbook and will support the requirements > of > > living in this cohousing commnity." However, a realtor in our midst > says, > > " Just so you all know, it is illegal to have potential buyer's sign > > anything in the state of TN because it looks discriminatory. As a > realtor, > > it is actually illegal for me to discriminate- it is clearly stated in > our > > rules. I know we wish for like minded people to be in our community but > as > > Realtors, we are not allowed to turn down an offer based upon some of > > things you have listed above since this isn't a Co-Op." > > > > Has anyone had the legality of their membership requirements questioned? > > Thanks in advance, > > -Barb Opyt > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > > http://l.cohousing.org/info > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://l.cohousing.org/info > > > >
- Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory?, (continued)
-
Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Dick Margulis, March 13 2018
-
Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Sharon Villines, March 13 2018
- Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Dick Margulis, March 13 2018
-
Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Sharon Villines, March 13 2018
-
Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Alicia Nowicki, March 13 2018
- Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Diana Carroll, March 14 2018
- Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Diana Carroll, March 14 2018
-
Re: Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Dick Margulis, March 13 2018
- Legality of membership agreements. Is it discriminatory? Mike Mariano, March 13 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.