Re: Attribution for borrowing policy language | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:16:07 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 12:12 AM, Susan Coffin <susanzephyr [at] gmail.com> wrote: > I am wondering what is usual and acceptable attribution when borrowing > policy language directly from another community? Or should I contact the > community directly to ask? Things that are protected/respected are ideas, not language or legal requirements. Very few things in legal documents are original. They are based on earlier documents — even if we think they are original, examples can usually be found of other people having invented the same solution and language. So just because it is new to you, doesn’t mean it is unique to the document you are reading. But certainly a note to the community whose documents have been helpful would be very nice. And, yes, by the time the documents are approved, they change a lot. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
Attribution for borrowing policy language Susan Coffin, March 18 2019
-
Re: Attribution for borrowing policy language Philip Dowds, March 19 2019
- Re: Attribution for borrowing policy language Dick Margulis, March 19 2019
- Re: Attribution for borrowing policy language Sharon Villines, March 19 2019
-
Re: Attribution for borrowing policy language Philip Dowds, March 19 2019
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.