Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:29:58 -0800 (PST) |
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 11:38 AM, Catya Belfer <catya [at] pobox.com> wrote: > > We have a ground rule that says "When in doubt, the facilitator decides”. In sociocracy, facilitators lead policy decision-making meeting (circle meetings). The facilitator decides with the consent of those present—no objections are raised. In an operations event, like painting all the trim on the outside of the common house, the operations leader makes the decisions within established policies. If there is no applicable policy, the leader makes the decision and it is discussed at the next policy meeting. Work goes forward — is not hindered by lack of a policy. I think the question of what goes in the Bylaws is really the issue. Do you only include those things that can be proven right or wrong? Should consequences be necessary and enforceable? Perhaps it brings up “What is a facilitator?" Sharon ---- Sharon Villines, Historic Takoma Park, Washington DC Where all roads lead to Casablanca
- Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings, (continued)
-
Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Tom @ Gather, December 16 2019
- Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Sharon Villines, December 16 2019
- Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Muriel Kranowski, December 17 2019
-
Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Catya Belfer, December 17 2019
- Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Sharon Villines, December 17 2019
- Message not available
- Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Catya Belfer, December 18 2019
- Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Mac Thomson, December 18 2019
-
Re: Role of facilitators at plenary meetings Tom @ Gather, December 16 2019
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.