Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Doug Huston (huston![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 09:15:15 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi Liz, I met you in Portland and enjoyed your sessions. We are about to have our first COVID era plenary meeting with a mix of in-person and Zoom. It will be an adventure and your e-mail was both funny and illustrative. - Doug > On Apr 26, 2020, at 8:21 AM, Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > We are using zoom. > > We had the unexpected challenge that our laminated cards are highly > reflective so we couldn't see what color they are. Also we had encouraged > folk to find things at home in the appropriate colors, thinking it would be > fun and funny--which it was--but mama mia you can't see what color a pencil > is on zoom, and red (stop the discussion) and orange (appreciation) look > pretty much exactly the same. > > For the easy decisions (approve minutes and approve agenda) we asked "any > objections" after carding so the people on the phone could speak up. For > the hard decision (spend $10,000 on new pathway lighting) we asked the > people on the phone what color their cards were. > > While the feedback from the meeting was mostly very positive the > facilitators were quite overwhelmed and we'll do somethings differently > next time. > We had both facilitators helping each other AND side discussions in > chat--we are inclined to turn off chat completely next time. There was no > way to keep up with it as facilitators. > (We'll tell people to text or use slack for their side discussions, which > folks did in our live meetings already.) > Does anyone know how to make it so cohosts can all chat but others cannot? > > Also we are thinking two hours is too long, next meeting 1.5 hours max. > > AND we are taking advantage of this opportunity to ask what was already out > in the air before this--why do we meet? What do we aim to get from meetings? > > Liz > Mosaic Commons in Berlin, MA > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:16 AM Dick Margulis <dick [at] dmargulis.com> wrote: > >> Rocky Corner is a whisker's breadth away from move-in (Xeno's Paradox in >> real life), and we have been using Zoom for meetings for a few years now. >> >> Main takeaway: meetings work much better with everyone on Zoom than with >> half the people in the room and the rest on the screen. That arrangement >> was perennially maddening, because the remote people missed much of what >> transpired in the room (too far from the mic, mumbling, crosstalk, body >> language, you name it). >> >> With everyone on screen, as we are now, we all have an easier time >> seeing everyone, the facilitator has better control of the process (and >> can mute people at will), we conduct rounds efficiently, and sociocratic >> decision-making goes smoothly. >> >> We use the chat feature for things like posting links and passing >> nominations in confidence to the facilitator (rather than slips of paper >> we would use in an in-person meeting). We use Google Drive for sharing >> the agenda and the meeting notes. People can screen share to present >> complex information, graphics, etc. >> >> Overall, I recommend Zoom or any equivalent platform for meetings >> anytime someone whose consent is required cannot be physically present. >> If you have good enough tech that one or two people can be remote and >> still participate fully with everyone else in a meeting room, go for it. >> But if you're jury-rigging a half-assed solution in someone's living >> room, it's better to have 100% of the participants on screen. >> >> Dick Margulis >> http://www.rockycorner.org/ >> >> >> On 4/26/2020 12:02 AM, Ann Zabaldo wrote: >>> Hello all — >>> >>> For those of you using a digital platform to conduct meetings, how are >> you handling consensus decision making? I’m not talking about discussion >> but the actual time you are moving towards consensus on a proposal. >>> >>> What challenges have you had or do you foresee? >>> >>> What has gone well w/ your consensus process via a digital platform? >>> >>> Do you have suggestions for communities starting to use a digital >> platform? >>> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://L.cohousing.org/info >> >> >> >> > > -- > -Liz > (The Rev. Dr.) Elizabeth Mae Magill > Pastor, Ashburnham Community Church > Minister to the Affiliates, Ecclesia Ministries > www.elizabethmaemagill.com > 508-450-0431 > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
-
Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Ann Zabaldo, April 25 2020
-
Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Dick Margulis, April 26 2020
- Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Chris Hansen, April 26 2020
-
Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Elizabeth Magill, April 26 2020
- Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Doug Huston, April 26 2020
-
Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Linda Hobbet, April 26 2020
- Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Sharon Villines, April 26 2020
- Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Linda Hobbet, April 26 2020
- Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Bob Leigh, April 26 2020
-
Re: Consensus Decision Making Using a Digital Platform Dick Margulis, April 26 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.