Re: Low-cost Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bartholomew.brian![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 22:20:24 -0700 (PDT) |
> what group of potential cohousers will take advantage of this? There are plenty of "homeless" people who already are able to afford a tiny amount of home in the form of tent cities. But it's illegal for them to rent porta-potties, or build a shared toilet/shower building like a camping area. Illegal, not 'costs too much'. Soon there will be more homeless, after people who have been banned from working for a few months are evicted from their homes and cars by bankruptcy. Cost is a Red Herring. It was never about cost, it was about legal prohibitions. It only appeared like cost because cohousing self-developers could hire architects and real estate lawyers and so forth to press their case. Brian
-
Low-cost Cohousing Sharon Villines, May 3 2020
- Re: Low-cost Cohousing Ron Ingram, May 3 2020
- Re: Low-cost Cohousing Brian Bartholomew, May 3 2020
-
Re: Low-cost Cohousing Ron Ingram, May 3 2020
- Re: Low-cost Cohousing Brian Bartholomew, May 4 2020
-
Re: Low-cost Cohousing Grace Kim, May 4 2020
- Re: Low-cost Cohousing Sharon Villines, May 4 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.