Re: Moving back from concensus? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lyn Deardorff (lynpeachtree![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 09:39:52 -0800 (PST) |
To Philip Dowds, Thanks for the informative answer. May I ask at what point you invoked the supermajority rule? After a certain number of meetings? Do you have a particular ruling on this? Thanks (again)! Lyn Deardorff Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L<mailto:cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 9:18 AM To: Cohousing-L<mailto:cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Cc: R Philip Dowds<mailto:rphilipdowds [at] me.com> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Moving back from concensus? I agree that consensus in cohousing works best when everyone is on board with a viable formal process and an expectation of compromise. It also helps to implement a structure of delegation such that only major issues and decisions arrive at plenary / full circle, and only after they’ve been well-baked by smaller groups. Even so, at Cornerstone, we now allow for a well-defined consensus process to conclude with one of two outcomes: (1) Ideally, with resolution of all objections, and solidarity/unanimity on the (revised and evolved) proposal; or, if solidarity is unfindable even after an arduous good-father effort, then (2) a super-majority vote (75% affirmation threshold). So have we abandoned consensus? What’s interesting is that now we find it’s actually easier to attain consensus agreement. We almost never go to super-majority vote. I think what’s happened is that those who are most in opposition discover that their own needs and interests are better served by participation in a consensus agreement than by adamant “blocking” that leads to a voting outcome. Compromise works better, I think, when everyone has a good reason to compromise. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA 02140 mobile: 617.460.4549 email: rphilipdowds [at] me.com > On Dec 13, 2020, at 9:47 AM, Martie Weatherly <mhweatherly [at] > earthlink.net> wrote: > > Re moving back from consensus: I suggest that you investigate what problems > you are having with consensus. It is not easy and it is different from the > competitive and individualistic culture we live in. But it does work if the > community is educated in how to use it. > > In our twenty year old community, we have more challenges now than we did at > the beginning, mainly because we have not kept up with educating our newer > people and re-educating ourselves. There is nothing like taking two emotional > opposing points of view and working out a solution that works for everyone. > It is possible and it is more important than ever that we learn how to work > things out. together. > > Martie Weatherly > Liberty Village > Frederick MD > > > Health and Wellness Coach > Facilitation Coach > coachmartie.com > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: Lyn Deardorff <lynpeachtree [at] outlook.com> >> Sent: Dec 12, 2020 8:11 PM >> To: "cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> >> Subject: [C-L]_ Moving back from concensus? >> >> Hi Everyone, >> I would like to hear from Co-Housing communities that have in any way moved >> back from Consensus. Did you adopt a Hybrid Consensus (move to a >> supermajority vote for example) or even abandoning it all together for a >> more traditional majority vote? >> >> If you wish to reply privately, understood: lynpeachtree [at] hotmail.com >> >> Thanks so much for any sharing you can do! >> >> Lyn Deardorff >> Sand River Co-Housing >> 404 377 8010 >> lynpeachtree [at] hotmail.com >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fl.cohousing.org%2Finfo&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ca229e01fe97a4710a9c908d89f8b0dda%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637434766864079529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=uWzFGu6LuPWi9OLFY1UgxNKI7c8W%2FjDmsIDt1aUFDVw%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fl.cohousing.org%2Finfo&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ca229e01fe97a4710a9c908d89f8b0dda%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637434766864079529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=uWzFGu6LuPWi9OLFY1UgxNKI7c8W%2FjDmsIDt1aUFDVw%3D&reserved=0 > > > _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fl.cohousing.org%2Finfo&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ca229e01fe97a4710a9c908d89f8b0dda%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637434766864079529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=uWzFGu6LuPWi9OLFY1UgxNKI7c8W%2FjDmsIDt1aUFDVw%3D&reserved=0
- Re: Moving back from concensus?, (continued)
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Sharon Villines, December 17 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? R Philip Dowds, December 18 2020
-
Re: Moving back from concensus? R Philip Dowds, December 13 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Lyn Deardorff, December 13 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? R Philip Dowds, December 13 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Mac Thomson, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Sharon Villines, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? R Philip Dowds, December 14 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.