Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:13:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Thank you for all the responses pubic and private my post on Jonathan Rauch’s The Constitution of Knowledge: A defense of the truth. I really do encourage anyone who is interested in understanding the anti-truth blast of negativity we have experienced in the last 20 years to read it. Rauch blames the "spiral of silence” for allowing the unreasoned well-organized minority to dominate. Reasonable people are quiet, hoping the flame will burn itself out. But the flame burns on threats of violence and intimidation. I find the “spiral” to be convincing. First you are silent, and then silenced. It just spirals out of control. The stereotype of the anti-vaccination argument as being anti-science, ignorant, daredevils that are marching in defiance of logic, however, is too narrow. There are also many other people who have very good reasons not to be vaccinated. Science has not proven anything conclusive about the vaccine or COVID. It’s too soon to make that claim. Look back at all the corrections made by the CDC and NIH. This is also evidence that scientific method is being used to determine what works but vaccination is just our best guess at the moment. It isn’t the best guess for everyone—vaccinations of any kind are dangerous for some people. There are also sound reasons to be cautious about claims of cures and safety. Everyday there is more evidence that vaccination is not the cure-all. It will not, at this point, eliminate COVID. The only sure defense is to avoid all human contact unless physically well-protected. Vaccination plus physical protection is probably better. But avoiding the source of the virus is still the only sure bet. And even then some people have been sickened and a source cannot be found. Viewpoint has a huge influence on the vaccination argument. I don't have to go out to work everyday. I live in an urban center where anything I need can be delivered. I live in a cohousing community that is cautious while still finding ways to be socially engaged and supportive. I have unlimited Facetime and Zoom and texting and email and the whole world wide web to explore. And I’m an introvert. I’m vaccinated because my neighbors were getting uncomfortable to have an unvaccinated person in their midst. I remember the smallpox vaccination at the age of 5 that was horrendous so I’m not right out there to get vaccinated against anything. I waited at least 2 months to see if there were generally bad reactions. Fauci and the public health professionals who live here, however, have a different viewpoint and a different responsibility. I see me myself able to live safely. They see millions and millions of people not able to live safely, health care institutions going under, caregivers with PTSD, and receiving personal blame everyday for not fixing this faster. Or even seeing it coming. (That they did see it coming we won’t go into now.) From their perspective, it is a no-brainer to emphasize the importance and safety of vaccination. The rewards are too massive and the defeats too defeating — wiping out even more of our population plus our institutions and economy. In academic circles the reasonable approach would be to stress the scientifically tested merits of the vaccines, acknowledge that some people are too delicate, and the importance of continued protections. But neither academia nor research institutes take responsibility for public health. They research, debate, and advise. A politician makes rules. Where is the power of my community? My city? My school system? Knowing if they make a good call but it still has devastating consequences, they are responsible. This is really off topic and too lecturing but it’s on the point when you think about cohousing being a liberal enclave that can easily err on the assume science is infallible side. In the rest of the book, Rauch presents incredible evidence of the bias in today’s academic disciplines toward the liberal. Some fields have no self-identified conservatives, for example. Others have 50 self-identified liberals to every 1 self-identified conservative. I think the same is true in cohousing and could have the same disastrous results. Narrow critical perspective. Please read this book: Jonathan Rauch’s _The Constitution of Knowledge: A defense of the truth._ https://amzn.to/3AYhva3 There are also ebooks available to check out remotely from your library but since it is a new book, it may not be there yet. Libraries typically wait until prices go down. Sharon ——— Sharon Villines, Editor & Publisher Affordable Housing means 30% of household income Cohousing means self-developed, self-governed, self-managed http://affordablecohousing.com
- Re: Consensus and Group Think Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking, (continued)
-
Re: Consensus and Group Think Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Chuck Harrison, August 22 2021
- Re: Consensus and Group Think Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Sarah Lesher, August 22 2021
- Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Sarah Lesher, August 17 2021
-
Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Jill B Murray, August 15 2021
- Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Sharon Villines, August 17 2021
-
Re: Consensus and Group Think Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Chuck Harrison, August 22 2021
- Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Crystal Farmer, August 16 2021
-
Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking fernselzer, August 16 2021
- Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking cohoyote [at] gmail.com, August 17 2021
- Re: Reality Based and Truth Seeking Jill B Murray, August 17 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.