Re: approval of plenary minutes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Maraiah (Lynn) Nadeau (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:04:34 -0700 (PDT) |
I’ve been secretary of RoseWind Cohousing for most of our 30+ years. Prior to publishing minutes I send a draft to several who were at the meeting, typically including those who facilitated and those presenting a proposal, or holding divergent opinions, for comment. I then use their suggestions to finish writing the minutes. At the head of minutes, just after the list of those present, I put “SUMMARY” and put any decisions we made. At the end of the full minutes, I put “Notes by Maraiah, reviewed by [Helen, Pete, and Kathy].” I then publish the minutes via email, post also on google docs, and put a paper copy in a notebook in the common house. At the following plenary meeting, the minutes are “reviewed” by reading just the Summary. Having already gotten input from some key people, and it being a month later, it is very rare that there are any corrections at this point. Just listed as “Minutes from June were reviewed.” Miscellaneous note: I take copious notes during the meeting. I copy and paste this, becoming my working draft. But I still have the raw notes to help me sort out any questions later, if needed. Maraiah Lynn Nadeau www.rosewind.org Port Townsend WA
-
approval of plenary minutes Muriel Kranowski, August 8 2022
- Re: approval of plenary minutes Elizabeth Magill, August 9 2022
- Re: approval of plenary minutes Sharon Villines, August 9 2022
- Re: approval of plenary minutes Maraiah (Lynn) Nadeau, August 9 2022
- Re: approval of plenary minutes Richard L Kohlhaas, August 9 2022
-
Re: approval of plenary minutes Sharon Villines, August 9 2022
- Re: approval of plenary minutes Muriel Kranowski, August 9 2022
- Re: approval of plenary minutes Max Tite, August 9 2022
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.