Re: Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system'
From: Kathleen Lowry (kathleenlowrylpcclmftgmail.com)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 08:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Thank you John! Very helpful. In order to give us a bit clearer picture of the 
necessary resources could you please say how many members were involved in each 
stage of the financing? Kathleen

> On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:23 AM, John Pustell via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] 
> cohousing.org> wrote:
> 
> For example re real costs here is how we financed things at Bay State 
> Commons (Just moved in in November 2022 after 9 years!) -
> 
> ** All initial funds for search and design came from ourselves - about 
> $400,000 (very risky investment)
> 
> ** Our land cost $2.2 million dollars - we raised 1/2 internally from our 
> members and 1/2 from a land loan. 
> 
> ** Our preconstruction design, engineering, permiting, etc cost another $1 
> million raised from ourselves. (now up to $2.5 million from ourselves - but 
> risk drastically reduced).
> 
> ** The construction loan provided another $11.5 million (net) - but they 
> required we raise another $2 million internally right then and show the means 
> to provide another $2.5 million ourselves later (The amount needed to fully 
> finance the project.) (A piece of that extra $2.5 mill was the 10% we'd get 
> from gaining new members until we were fully subscribed - at start of 
> construction we still had 8 units not spoken for.)
> 
> Once we had land and a design, we required that every member invest at least 
> 10% of their estimated purchase price.  Those that could invest more were 
> provided with discounts to their purchase price based on how much extra they 
> put in and for how long.
> 
> All funds were at risk until the building was finished and we all bought our 
> units (the sale event).  No one who left could get any funds back until that 
> sale event.
> 
> My take away is a brand new co-housing project built in a major metropolitan 
> area in the US is not cheap housing and can only be financed by those who can 
> afford to risk those funds and who really believe in the concept.  (We 
> believed that if we needed too we could shut the project down, sell the land 
> and get back a fair percentage of what we invested. AND, when COVID happened 
> we did think about it. ... but I am glad we did not have to put that to the 
> test.)
> 
> Other forms of financing - or other cheaper means of creating the units (and 
> maybe ways to accelerate the time frame) will be needed to make it an 
> "affordable Housing" thing.
> 
> John Pustell
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cohousing-L [mailto:cohousing-l-bounces+jpustell=verizon.net [at] 
> cohousing.org] On Behalf Of Steve Welzer
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 6:42 PM
> To: Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org
> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system'
> 
> Katie McCamant wrote:
>> all new projects that have successfully launched are by people who 
>> fronted their own funds to find land and pay for all the development 
>> costs until they could get to a construction loan . And yes, that is a 
>> big lift!
> 
> Well, I believe that the restoration of ecological and social sanity depends 
> upon people getting back to living in an eco-communitarian way.
> That's the way human beings lived sustainably and satisfactorily for 99% of 
> our species history prior to the modern-era withering of community life.
> 
> So we just must find ways to scale up and generalize what we, in our 
> movement, know to be "best practices."
> 
> Steve Welzer
> Altair EcoVillage project participant
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
> http://L.cohousing.org/info
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
> http://L.cohousing.org/info
> 
> 
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.