Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system' | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Pustell (jpustell![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT) |
Kathleen - We are a 30 unit condo and cost almost $19 million to do. (We are 400 feet from a Boston Subway system stop so land was pricey and small.) Part of the reason our costs were so high were: ** delays due to COVID (adding to financing costs and increasing constructions costs), and ** delays due to getting City approvals - the boards were not so friendly to us (Zoning and Historical) but the City council was very supportive and did a lot for us - but which took time.) ** Need to have 50 parking spaces (1 per bedroom per zoning rules that were not waived for us) which required a full underground garage for 39 cars. By the time we finalized on the land - we were about 12-15 members By the time we finalized the design and began negotiating with builders we were about 22 (A lot came when we were able to say we had a specific piece of land to build on.) By the time we started construction - we were 26 members We added our last 2 members in 2022 (the year of move in.) Along the way we lost 6 members we had to replace because we just took too long. (Don't stop recruiting even when you are full! - someone is bound to lose their job or have to move on for some reason even just before the sales event. John -----Original Message----- From: Cohousing-L [mailto:cohousing-l-bounces+jpustell=verizon.net [at] cohousing.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Lowry Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 11:52 AM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system' Thank you John! Very helpful. In order to give us a bit clearer picture of the necessary resources could you please say how many members were involved in each stage of the financing? Kathleen > On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:23 AM, John Pustell via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > ?For example re real costs here is how we financed things at Bay State > Commons (Just moved in in November 2022 after 9 years!) - > > ** All initial funds for search and design came from ourselves - about > $400,000 (very risky investment) > > ** Our land cost $2.2 million dollars - we raised 1/2 internally from our > members and 1/2 from a land loan. > > ** Our preconstruction design, engineering, permiting, etc cost another $1 > million raised from ourselves. (now up to $2.5 million from ourselves - but > risk drastically reduced). > > ** The construction loan provided another $11.5 million (net) - but > they required we raise another $2 million internally right then and > show the means to provide another $2.5 million ourselves later (The > amount needed to fully finance the project.) (A piece of that extra > $2.5 mill was the 10% we'd get from gaining new members until we were > fully subscribed - at start of construction we still had 8 units not > spoken for.) > > Once we had land and a design, we required that every member invest at least > 10% of their estimated purchase price. Those that could invest more were > provided with discounts to their purchase price based on how much extra they > put in and for how long. > > All funds were at risk until the building was finished and we all bought our > units (the sale event). No one who left could get any funds back until that > sale event. > > My take away is a brand new co-housing project built in a major > metropolitan area in the US is not cheap housing and can only be > financed by those who can afford to risk those funds and who really > believe in the concept. (We believed that if we needed too we could > shut the project down, sell the land and get back a fair percentage of > what we invested. AND, when COVID happened we did think about it. ... > but I am glad we did not have to put that to the test.) > > Other forms of financing - or other cheaper means of creating the units (and > maybe ways to accelerate the time frame) will be needed to make it an > "affordable Housing" thing. > > John Pustell > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cohousing-L > [mailto:cohousing-l-bounces+jpustell=verizon.net [at] cohousing.org] On > Behalf Of Steve Welzer > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 6:42 PM > To: Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org > Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system' > > Katie McCamant wrote: >> all new projects that have successfully launched are by people who >> fronted their own funds to find land and pay for all the development >> costs until they could get to a construction loan . And yes, that is >> a big lift! > > Well, I believe that the restoration of ecological and social sanity depends > upon people getting back to living in an eco-communitarian way. > That's the way human beings lived sustainably and satisfactorily for 99% of > our species history prior to the modern-era withering of community life. > > So we just must find ways to scale up and generalize what we, in our > movement, know to be "best practices." > > Steve Welzer > Altair EcoVillage project participant > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://L.cohousing.org/info
- Re: Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system', (continued)
- Re: Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system' Kathryn McCamant, March 15 2023
- Re: Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system' Sharon Villines, March 15 2023
- Re: Steve Welzer's Challenge to the cohousing 'system' Mac Thomson, March 15 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.